antfromtashkent said: Euphoria14 said: antfromtashkent said: Euphoria14 said: antfromtashkent said: Euphoria14 said: I am guessing this would drive them nuts then huh? This is like a double whammy for them. Double dead! Just to add to my previous post, me and my family have a habit of bringing in strays that have no homes. People say we should bring them to a shelter, but odds are not that high that most of them will be picked up and brought into a home.    Well PETA has no problem if u kill a dead dog... besides... if it starts chewing on your face... you dont have many options... Well I still think it is silly that the PETA would rather have the Nazi dogs run up to you to lick your face than attack. I find this almost as silly as when the PETA wanting more Vegetarian dishes in Cooking Mamma.   the problem is that (restating my post from above) dogs dont have much of a choise to go into war, they are trained that way... humans have a choise... i think that they would prefer that they just dont use attack dogs... which is pretty difficult in this type of game since they were a part of WW... That is where the big problem is. They would rather developers to make games more friendly and change how things really were back during those times. Playing a war game and taking dogs on walks and playing frisbee? Come on, seriously? If you get right down to it... there has been plenty of WW games that did not have them.... there is no reason to include them.... and if its something so trivial (which can be removed) and it offends other parties there is no reason to have them.... videogames get enough heat now a days as it is.... and to get it over something so stupid as this is just asking for trouble

Submitting to PETA would be the worst thing you could do.

Haven't you ever been taught to stand up for yourself?  geeze.

I don't understand how PETA survives. You'd think any sane person would realize what a joke they are.
Wonder what they think about Korea. :P Although technically banned, they consume something like 8,000 tons of dog meat every year, with another 93,000 tons being used for medicine. (ok, so it's wiki info. has to be close. )

I mean, killing dogs and eating them has got to be worse than shooting virtual nazi attack dogs that are hell bent on chewing your face off, no?

im just sayng that you have to pick your battles... video games have no need for any more attention... not saying you ahve to ruin you artistic vition... but something as trivial is this not something that worth arguing about...

I have not played CoD:WaW yet. But my guess is, based upon past games in this genre, that you have to shoot dogs who are attacking (or about to attack) you. (This goes back to Castle Wolfenstein )

If that is the case, then PETA needs to just realize that war is hell and move on to being critical about the soldiers being served meat or some other meaningless complaint (for the record, I have no problem with vegetarianism but I do have a problem of people forcing you to accept their views).


Mike from Morgantown

Now if you are just randomly shooting dogs, then there might be a problem.

Why not? This is a small battle. It's easy for the video game industry to win. If anything, this is the battle to pick.

Let us abolish Mario games next. Think of the poor koopas.

i think that this is the time for the videogame industry to finally be the bigger person and get some positive press for ones.....

Goomba's are more vulnerable and there's many more of them.

Those damn red and green wearing fatties are torturing the poor defenseless Goomba's.

fuck this shit i love dogs but i like them in call of duty

so what you are saying is that youre not gonna like the next CoD cause it dosent have dogs to kill? gimme a break... there is no reason to argue about this....