I think the Conduit will have good first week sales worldwide. I just want to know if the game can have a similar successful release like Killzone 2. I don't know, maybe it could sell 450k first week worldwide.

no... madworld is a mouch more intresting game and it did not.

170 WW.

Somewhere around 200k, perhaps. Not quite so much as Killzone 2, but the sales patterns for both consoles must be taken into effect.

I think even that's a bit high. I'd be surprised if it got 100k first week. My hope would be that it would have strong legs and pick up in sales as it gets played and appreciated. Without local multiplayer though, it's legs will still be limited.

170k for America, 60k for EU. You heard it here first, folks! ;)

Slightly higher than Madworld, so nowhere near Killzone 2. Of course, if we look at the comparative budgets, it will probably still have a successful launch

humph.....tough question, no doubt it won't have KZ2 sales for it's first week because it seems not many wii owners actually like fps (from what had understood based on this site), you should also factor in that most of the hardcore wii owners are hypocrites. While always flailing around saying they want more hardcore games they never buy them out of the most stupid of reasons(for reference you need only look into the news section right now and read the comments regarding conduit pics).

that's actually what is most dangerous for games like the Conduit. hopefully his game will reach 250 to 300k sales in week one for combined us and ue sales, but i wouldn't bet my money on that. 150k seems more likely.

I can´t realldy predict how it will perform, but I think there will be more and more mature games on the Wii in the near future. At some time, they have to sell good but I´m not sure if it´ll start with Conduit. By the way, I wouldn´t be surprised if it sold like Madworld and showed some legs to crawl to 1 million for example, which wouldn´t be bad at all.

Sales wise? No

It will be financially successful since money isn't being spent on graphics, obviously.