I've been trusting the members of this site more and more. Especially since a lot of the "professionals" haven't been so professional lately.

Gamespot

ANYBODY THAT SAYS IGN

look at nfs most wanted they gave the ps2 the highest score wen the 360 and GC versions have the better graphics the 360 version has next gen graphics and a day and night cycle and online play and even in the 360's review the reviewer clearly says that the 360 version is the best yet it has a lower score than the ps2 version wats up with that

IGN

i usually agree with ign, i like edge tho a lot too.

generally the older type sites, or ones that seem written by adults maybe.

now for the worst reviews online definetly here at VGCHARTZ

(see fallout 3)

ign hands down.

second place gametrailers .

gamespot is too rigorous most of times

SDF

- RPGFan
- GameCritics (only reviews from Brad Gallaway and Mike Bracken. They're pretty much spot on for me).

If we're talking about sites that review games, Vgchartz.

On the other hand, if we're talking about sites where the main emphasis is on reviewing...it would be IGN.

Gamespot and IGN is usually where i go. But they all spin things differnt ways so it depends on the reviewer more than the site.

IGN and Gamespot are both jokes. They both lost their credibility years ago.

I don't really like any sources, but the only ones I read are EDGE, Eurogamer, and GameTrailers. I also read Nintendo Power, but that's mostly because I grew up with the magazine.