SHMUPGurus said:
Still, you can't deny that they allowed 360-only owners to be able to play games such as Devil May Cry 4, Grand Theft Auto IV, Final Fantasy XIII, Tekken 6, etc.
Also, think about XBLA, the XNA, etc. Amazing services that allow games like Braid and R-Type Dimensions to exist.
PS3-only owners have no right to complain, they still get the games anyway! Internal affairs are what they are. Power to the consumers prevail in the end.
|
I see a big difference between paying so that what was once an exclusive is extended to their platform (it helps their hardware sales and makes happy their customers) vs paying for exclusivity of some content (it helps their hardware sales, it doesn' add squat for their customers).
The first is akin to financing r&d, you're paying so that something is built. Every gamer's happy save for the chronically insecure that loses a bragging right.
The second is akin to paying retailers so that they don't sell games for the competitor's platform. A purely commercial operation, the gamers' community loses, save again for the chronically insecure that gains a bragging right.
I'm a gamer, I'm not a fanboy, I know which of these operations I like and which I don't.