By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Future: Nintendo could be only video game seller and have monopoly

vic_viper said:
Sky Render ladies and gentlman.

I kind of want to give him some sort of medal.



Around the Network

Oh, I don't do anything special. I just study history, learn trends and patterns, come to understand underlying systems of behaviour, and then apply what I've learned to the present and predictions for the future. Anybody can do it, really.



Sky Render - Sanity is for the weak.

Sky Render said:
It's not impossible, Pristine, just not likely to happen simultaneously. It's not uncommon for same-value competitors to basically destroy each other in their race to outdo one another. Happens in all manner of industries all the time, and the mutual destruction is most common when a disruptive competitor offsets the advantages of the competing companies and forces them to become niche.

 

Isn't this kind of what's said in the "everyone goes for the blonde" analogy in "A Beautiful Mind"?



I don't really see what was so spectacular about Sky Render's comment especially in light of my earlier comment that if both Sony and Microsoft removed their consoles from the market someone else ie. Sega could enter the market with a console that was just as powerful as the Wii that would cost $100 less than the Wii does and that had all of the hardcore type of games that many people say the Wii doesn't have and that don't usually sell well on the Wii but that have shown they have good combined sales on PS3 and 360.



Heavens to Murgatoids.

Nintendo....

a company that saved Video Games .... and the company who will Destroy It.



Around the Network

This would be one of the worst things that could possibly happen the gaming!
Monopolies suck for the consumer!

That being said, it will never happen. There will always be at least two major consoles. It may not be the same companies, but there will always be some company willing to take the risk.



ViolentPhlegm said:
Most people in the world don't have HD televisions but a significant chunk of the population does and we shouldn't have to wait another generation for our videogames to take advantage of them. You can make HD games that can be downconverted to SD and still be playable. I hardly know anyone anymore that doesn't have at least one flat panel television and 2009 is the end of the line for analog TV signals in the US. That is going to drive adoption even more. And no 5.1 at this stage of the game? Really?

Nintendo's press conference at last year's E3 made their position clear: they don't care about core gamers because they don't have to. Fair enough. It's not such a bad thing to have different consoles for different markets. I think Nintendo recognizes that even if some of the posters in this thread do not.

 

It's your lucky day! You don't.

 



^^Yeah, I don't even see what was his argument there. Btw, anecdotal evidence is just that. Just because you don't know anyone, doesn't mean that most people in the country own a flat panel. And not all flat panels are HD. As for the analog thing...I remember when 2006 was supposed to be its last year. What year is it now?

I won't even bother commenting on the core gamer crap you said again.



Proud member of the Mega Mario Movement

 

Warrior of Light

BTFeather55 said:
I don't really see what was so spectacular about Sky Render's comment especially in light of my earlier comment that if both Sony and Microsoft removed their consoles from the market someone else ie. Sega could enter the market with a console that was just as powerful as the Wii that would cost $100 less than the Wii does and that had all of the hardcore type of games that many people say the Wii doesn't have and that don't usually sell well on the Wii but that have shown they have good combined sales on PS3 and 360.

 Not really, no.  For one thing, I'm well-known for making these sorts of analyses and discussing market trends.  For another, I didn't specify any competitor or what they would do.  Although I can say this: the odds are far better that any challenger to the Wii's dominance will attempt to go for a compromise between the two markets instead of aiming specifically for the portion of the market which the Wii is reviled by.

 The most likely scenario for a Wii competitor from a new contender would be one which carries the values of the Wii even further (ie. the immersiveness of control and immediate pick-up-and-play appeal) and attempts to merge them with a few fundamental values of upmarket gaming which the Wii does not embody (ie. higher-quality graphics, better processing power).  This is, in a nutshell, what Sega did with the Genesis.  And in the end, it only worked because of the software they came up with to make that difference mean something to consumers, a game we know as Sonic the Hedgehog.



Sky Render - Sanity is for the weak.

unlikely. These 2 companies have the money to fail and keep trying many more times.

But who knows...