naznatips said:
I think if it hadn't been for the pointless collection mission at the end it would have been a 9.7. Gametrailers mentioned it in their review as well (giving it a 9.6). It seems to be a nasty little interruption to the flow of the game. I don't blame them for the 9.5. I think that's a very good review and I respect IGN for their fairness. 1UP I think probably took off too much... they really seemed to have very little to complain about to take off a full point, but in general I'm happy with their review as well. As far as if Halo 3 will lose points, I really hope not. I don't think it's fair to judge a console on something it's not capable of in the first place. Yes, the controls in Prime 3 may be better than dual analog, but you shouldn't judge shooters that don't have that available based on that. Similarly, it's not fair to judge Wii games against 360 and PS3 graphics. Although I think it's interesting that every review so far (IGN, 1UP, Gametrailers) has stated that in overall aesthetic the game is in line with everything on the PS3 and 360. I guess since they were comparing the artwork and graphics, rather than just graphics, it was a fair review. |
Well, in their review they said that they didn't noticed the location of the energy cells were in their log or something, so they did spent pointless time searching for the things. Even if it's that long though, Metroid always has backtracking, it the way of Samus. Are you questioning Samus? "Nova beam wipes naz of the face of earth"
The review was a fair one( Ign) and very insightfull. 1up review was actually fairer than i expected (was predicting 87-88%) since their preview was extremely biased and they had issues even with the box cover.
As for Halo 3, it's not a question on graphics. It's about the impressions that stay with you after you play a title. Graphically Halo 3 should blow Corruption apart, there no one questioning that. Yet, if the gameplay aspect left Ign so impressed (Gametrailers said the same thing about how it blows analog controls away) a form af slight dissapointment. If could be that i'm exxagerating things and the controls aren't that monumental, but still, with 2 reviews already saying that it's the best thing after mouse and keyboard (Ign even compares the turning time to Mouse controls, something i have never witnessed anyone to do in console FPSs.) Being on a different control sceme due to it's existence on another console might be unfair, but MP will get compared to Halo nevertheless, whether we want it or not, as proven by all the major review sites. It's not a question of fanboyism among them, it's just that the games have similliarities which pits them against each other. It's a natural thing to compare, in the quest of higher standards. Good graphics are in a lot of titles, flawless gameplay...not so much.
Still, i thing due to it's grand user base and success, Halo is going to be less criticised on gameplay aspects than Corruption. I just wonder what the negative points will be. But since it's halo, i guess 10's will be used whether it's worth it or not.