By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PS3 Vs Xbox 360. CNET Prizefighter

well you can't get any more proof of being biased than doing an assessment like this then declare one console a winner at the end. Media publications that want to have the label of being unbiased should know better and steer clear of doing something like this. Each of the scores he gives are highly subjective, especially the 'games' one. It's more fair to say "this is better in this way, less in that"- but having the 'winner' at the end is just flat out ridiculous; cause not everyone wants the same thing out of a console.

It just bothers me to have major respected new sites to do something like this and pretty much tell less informed people to buy an xbox 360 over a PS3, based on highly subjective opinions.



 

Around the Network

The oh noes American media waaaaaaahh waaaaaahh, geez do you realize how lame that sounds? Don't blame us blame C-Net.

I think the category of value is bogus though, it depends on needs and budget. If one wants a BR player, then the PS3 is a no brainer, if they just want a console and don't need the BR than clearly the 360 is a better value (cheaper). Same goes with wifi. While I think ATM the 360 is a slightly better choice for many, that could easily change with a price cut.

They also biffed online if you ask me. The 360 does have the upper hand right now, but the price is absurd. $50 a year may not sound like much but it adds up over the life of a console.

All in all I think it was a decent comparison, not great but better than many I have seen. IMHO the 360 is the system of choice if you want multi-plat games because they almost always look better. On the other hand I think the PS3 currently has better exclusives, of course that is only my taste YMMV.



XBL: WiiVault Wii: PM me  PSN: WiiVault

PC: AMD Athlon II Quadcore 635 (OC to 4.0ghz) , ATI Radeon 5770 1GB (x2)

MacBook Pro C2D 2.8ghz, 9600m GT 512 iMac: C2D 2.0, X2600XT 256

 

blazinhead89 said:
jesus kung fu magic said:

 

1. The 360 still has the most exclusive AAA games atm/ 360:8 , PS3:3

2. 360 had more AAA titles than the ps3 last year. 360 L4D, braid, gears 2/PS3 MGS4 LBP

3. One game doesnt mean youve pulled ahead.

4. So let the J man get this straight , just because the psn is making an update to catch up to the xbl means that its surpasses it?

 

If it is free then yes it would surpass it. BTW i don't believe it will surpass it soon. But it will more than likely surpass it imo

 

Do you think 360 is going to just sit still?  They revampped their entire UX last year and added party mode, netflix, rip-game-to-drive, etc.  Do you really think they're all done now?  Sure, PS3 will have an update which will improve things for them - so will 360 - you can really only compare what's currently on the boxes - because they both have a continuous stream of new features shipping in updates.



C8 said:
blazinhead89 said:
jesus kung fu magic said:

 

1. The 360 still has the most exclusive AAA games atm/ 360:8 , PS3:3

2. 360 had more AAA titles than the ps3 last year. 360 L4D, braid, gears 2/PS3 MGS4 LBP

3. One game doesnt mean youve pulled ahead.

4. So let the J man get this straight , just because the psn is making an update to catch up to the xbl means that its surpasses it?

 

If it is free then yes it would surpass it. BTW i don't believe it will surpass it soon. But it will more than likely surpass it imo

 

Do you think 360 is going to just sit still?  They revampped their entire UX last year and added party mode, netflix, rip-game-to-drive, etc.  Do you really think they're all done now?  Sure, PS3 will have an update which will improve things for them - so will 360 - you can really only compare what's currently on the boxes - because they both have a continuous stream of new features shipping in updates.


Well i believe that the features are all on the 360, what else could they add? Maybe a few minor tweaks, but PS3 is nowhere near complete in the features to be added . Imo of course

Quartz said:
Soleron said:
blazinhead89 said:

 

L4D is coming to the PS3? lol, It's funny how they mention there is nothing graphically like Killzone 2 on the 360, yet they give both the same for graphics 

 

So no Wii game should ever get higher than a 5 for graphics? Because no Wii game can physically match the other two consoles?

"Graphics" should be all of these factors:

i) Objectively how good is it

ii) How far have they pushed the system?

iii) Art direction, tone, style, how well it suited the game, etc.

iv) Does the level of graphics match the gameplay (no good having 16xAA 1080p Tetris)?

Imagine no. iv... that'll be a laugh!

 

 

just when u thought tetris pieces were all boxes...they're actually all circles connected together



Around the Network
blazinhead89 said:
C8 said:
blazinhead89 said:
jesus kung fu magic said:

 

1. The 360 still has the most exclusive AAA games atm/ 360:8 , PS3:3

2. 360 had more AAA titles than the ps3 last year. 360 L4D, braid, gears 2/PS3 MGS4 LBP

3. One game doesnt mean youve pulled ahead.

4. So let the J man get this straight , just because the psn is making an update to catch up to the xbl means that its surpasses it?

 

If it is free then yes it would surpass it. BTW i don't believe it will surpass it soon. But it will more than likely surpass it imo

 

Do you think 360 is going to just sit still?  They revampped their entire UX last year and added party mode, netflix, rip-game-to-drive, etc.  Do you really think they're all done now?  Sure, PS3 will have an update which will improve things for them - so will 360 - you can really only compare what's currently on the boxes - because they both have a continuous stream of new features shipping in updates.


 

Well i believe that the features are all on the 360, what else could they add? Maybe a few minor tweaks, but PS3 is nowhere near complete in the features to be added . Imo of course

So your saying xbl is near perfection in features for an online service?

 



N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!

jesus kung fu magic said:
blazinhead89 said:
C8 said:
blazinhead89 said:
jesus kung fu magic said:

 

1. The 360 still has the most exclusive AAA games atm/ 360:8 , PS3:3

2. 360 had more AAA titles than the ps3 last year. 360 L4D, braid, gears 2/PS3 MGS4 LBP

3. One game doesnt mean youve pulled ahead.

4. So let the J man get this straight , just because the psn is making an update to catch up to the xbl means that its surpasses it?

 

If it is free then yes it would surpass it. BTW i don't believe it will surpass it soon. But it will more than likely surpass it imo

 

Do you think 360 is going to just sit still?  They revampped their entire UX last year and added party mode, netflix, rip-game-to-drive, etc.  Do you really think they're all done now?  Sure, PS3 will have an update which will improve things for them - so will 360 - you can really only compare what's currently on the boxes - because they both have a continuous stream of new features shipping in updates.


 

Well i believe that the features are all on the 360, what else could they add? Maybe a few minor tweaks, but PS3 is nowhere near complete in the features to be added . Imo of course

So your saying xbl is near perfection in features for an online service?

 


For sure Jesus Kung Fu, Feature wise definetly :)

PS3's online is better than Xbox Live.

I honestly can't stand Xbox Live. I'd rather play the Wii online than the 360.



I am Washu-bot B, loyal servant of Final-Fan, the greatest scientific genius in the universe!


Squilliam said:
saxophonehero said:
ROBOTECHHEAVEN said:
the point about no games on the 360 match killzone 2 that is a complete bs statement. gears of war 1 and 2 say hi.

 

not really have you seen killzone 2 and u think that gears can compare with that. if post something pls be sensible.

The problem is that Xbox 360 owners have LOTS of friends so co-op and such is very important. PS3 owners just have internet friends. So to PS3 owners, not having co-op isn't actually a big deal but for 360 owners it is.

(Im just explaining why you guys have differing points of view)

Alas it makes about as much sense as OMGZ KZ@!!! So its as much a joke as the idea that KZ2 has already proved itself *superior*

 

I LOL'd hard. Apparently I have no friends outside the internet. You shouldn't generalize like that.

 



SnakeEyez said:
Squilliam said:
saxophonehero said:
ROBOTECHHEAVEN said:
the point about no games on the 360 match killzone 2 that is a complete bs statement. gears of war 1 and 2 say hi.

 

not really have you seen killzone 2 and u think that gears can compare with that. if post something pls be sensible.

The problem is that Xbox 360 owners have LOTS of friends so co-op and such is very important. PS3 owners just have internet friends. So to PS3 owners, not having co-op isn't actually a big deal but for 360 owners it is.

(Im just explaining why you guys have differing points of view)

Alas it makes about as much sense as OMGZ KZ@!!! So its as much a joke as the idea that KZ2 has already proved itself *superior*

 

I LOL'd hard. Apparently I have no friends outside the internet. You shouldn't generalize like that.

 

I'll be your internet friend if you really want, though im not flying over there to be your real life friend!

 



Tease.