well you can't get any more proof of being biased than doing an assessment like this then declare one console a winner at the end. Media publications that want to have the label of being unbiased should know better and steer clear of doing something like this. Each of the scores he gives are highly subjective, especially the 'games' one. It's more fair to say "this is better in this way, less in that"- but having the 'winner' at the end is just flat out ridiculous; cause not everyone wants the same thing out of a console.
It just bothers me to have major respected new sites to do something like this and pretty much tell less informed people to buy an xbox 360 over a PS3, based on highly subjective opinions.












