By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Man arrested with rifle said he had delivery for Obama

@ KASZ - UK healthcare is free and we don't particularly have that problem. If something needs to be done it tends to be quite good. In fact, our family gets private healthcare for free due to my dads job. But I still go to the NHS for everything. Sometimes it works well if the government do it right.



Around the Network
kitler53 said:
Kasz216 said:
highwaystar101 said:
__XBrawlX__ said:
Why is Free Health Care considered a bad thing? It derives from socialism, but it doesn't mean its bad. I guess you guys must think all Canadians are Socialists! :P

this...

 

By the way, I'm a capatalist, but to be honest, I think having a hardcore capatalist take on finances would just fuck up a country, you need a bit of socialism to balance things out. Not much, barely any, but some.

 

Seriously, the reason why free healthcare is seen as bad is because the Government is the one who needs to decide how much demand each region and area is going to need healthcare wise... and the government sucks at planning things.

So what happens is that people are forced on waiting lists, often for vital surgeries.  In canada for example people who need vital surgeries are often sent to the US.

That's really the problem, the government has to set supply and guage demand... and the government is likely to screw that up...

While supply vs demand in a free market system lets the market adjust.

the couple canadians i've talked to have it the other way around.  it's easy to fast track the vital health needs but if you want to do anything "elective" fat chance.

 

I'm guessing they don't live in Ontario? Elective care is a problem too.... but that's elective stuff.  Which is really what universal healthcare should focus on anwyay, since hospitals have to treat dieing people in the US anyway.

Preventitive care is what you should focus any healthcare system on.

As for an article about the critically ill....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1956732/posts

 



That Guy said:
Reagan was shot, wasn't he?

 

Yes, but as awesome as Reagan is, he survived.



I think Halogamer is writing from prison...



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

Domo-Kun said:
@Kaz

While that doesn't sound like an ultra great system, I think it's still better than what we have here in the states.

My Father-in-law has a bad back. It's so bad that he cannot walk straight up and down anymore, he always has to bend over and will probably be using a cane soon.

He has to take care of my mother and my disabled nephew on a day to day basis, but if he gets much worse, he won't even be able to take care of himself, let alone them.

He hasn't gone to get his back fixed because him and mom are too damn broke.

So, even though it would suck for him to be put on a waiting list, chances are, it would still be better than not getting anything done at all.

Oh, i believe in giving everyone access to the healthcare they need.  It's just taking the Supply and Demand aspect out of it is a bad idea.

Whether that's better or not is argueable. 

In your father in laws case... better.  People who are bleeding in their heads and suffering brain damage because of it.... worse.

A better option is to empower the people in some way.

Like perhaps... a draft of doctors.

Everyone who is a liscensed doctor has to perform so many yearly hours in clinics that provide non life saving treatment to the poor. (Life saving treatment always being provided anyway.)

The number of hours you need to serve would be proportional to the number of hours you work.  You work more.... you need to work more hours for the government at a lower paygrade... or suffer a larger tax bracket penalty that would be used to pay other doctors to work there.

That makes the demand scaleable.

 



Around the Network

I understand what you mean.

However, I have heard that many of the people who need immediate care are top priority, not the other way around.

However, I do not live in Canadia, so I cannot confirm this in any way.



We'll miss you George.

PSN:Puzzleface

XBL:XpuzzlefaceX

My friends call me Hadoken because I'm down-right fierce

highwaystar101 said:
@ KASZ - UK healthcare is free and we don't particularly have that problem. If something needs to be done it tends to be quite good. In fact, our family gets private healthcare for free due to my dads job. But I still go to the NHS for everything. Sometimes it works well if the government do it right.

I wouldn't say that the UK system doesn't have it's delay problems.

http://www.liberty-page.com/issues/healthcare/ukheartdelay2.html

Sure the heart healthcare is good... but the same problems occur in the system... and would be worse in a country like the US which is much bigger.

 



I'd say free preventative healthcare FTW!

We should be providing free checkups and stuff so that people don't develop big problems later on. anything that's not "preventative" I guess would be taken care of through insurance through work or whatnot



Always remember: 'free' health care is never, ever free. Someone pays for it. If it's socialist, everyone pays for it. Every US citizen (or at least a decent bit of them) that holds a job here pays part of their check out for healthcare as it is. I can only imagine what'll happen if they tack on an extra 10% for socialistic medicine.

Then our $8/hr paychecks that really give us $6.50 drop to around $5.90. Brilliant!



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

I would gladly tag another 10% in taxes for a social health care system.

another 10% on my paycheck isn't shit when it comes to me, my wife and my son's health.



We'll miss you George.

PSN:Puzzleface

XBL:XpuzzlefaceX

My friends call me Hadoken because I'm down-right fierce