Domo-Kun said: @Kaz
While that doesn't sound like an ultra great system, I think it's still better than what we have here in the states.
My Father-in-law has a bad back. It's so bad that he cannot walk straight up and down anymore, he always has to bend over and will probably be using a cane soon.
He has to take care of my mother and my disabled nephew on a day to day basis, but if he gets much worse, he won't even be able to take care of himself, let alone them.
He hasn't gone to get his back fixed because him and mom are too damn broke.
So, even though it would suck for him to be put on a waiting list, chances are, it would still be better than not getting anything done at all. |
Oh, i believe in giving everyone access to the healthcare they need. It's just taking the Supply and Demand aspect out of it is a bad idea.
Whether that's better or not is argueable.
In your father in laws case... better. People who are bleeding in their heads and suffering brain damage because of it.... worse.
A better option is to empower the people in some way.
Like perhaps... a draft of doctors.
Everyone who is a liscensed doctor has to perform so many yearly hours in clinics that provide non life saving treatment to the poor. (Life saving treatment always being provided anyway.)
The number of hours you need to serve would be proportional to the number of hours you work. You work more.... you need to work more hours for the government at a lower paygrade... or suffer a larger tax bracket penalty that would be used to pay other doctors to work there.
That makes the demand scaleable.