By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - OMG ! I HATE UBISOFT !!!!

naznatips said:
sinha said:
naznatips said:
I suppose I really don't care if that's what Ubisoft thinks, because we have already seen what happens to the random shit casual games thrown at the Wii (Boogie). If it takes developers another year to figure out that this crap doesn't sell, that's their loss.

That's possible. Or the lesson they may learn if these Boogie-type games fail is that third party games don't sell all that well on the Wii, period.

The question is: will they go from making cheap casual games to higher quality casual games, or will they go from making cheap casual games to even cheaper casual games... or even no games?



3.) Stop developing on the Wii and only make games on the 360 and PS3. This option could have three results:
a) If 3rd parties do this, the PS3 will not get any non-multiplatform games, and the system will die. As it stands, the PS3 completely depends on 3rd party Wii games selling if it wants any 3rd party exclusives. Otherwise companies can not survive making exclusive games on it. It's too much of a business risk. The PS3 will not survive with no exclusive games. If it leeches everything off of the 360, people will simply buy the 360 instead because it's cheaper.


"As it stands, the PS3 completely depends on 3rd party Wii games selling if it wants any 3rd party exclusives."

I don't get what you mean by this, can you elaborate?  Are you saying if 3rd party Wii games don't sell, the PS3 won't get any 3rd party exclusives?  Why wouldn't it?  

 

"The PS3 will not survive with no exclusive games."

True. 

 

"If it leeches everything off of the 360, people will simply buy the 360 instead because it's cheaper."

I think this part is already coming true to some extent in NA (all of the 360-PS3 games get better review scores and sell more units on the 360).



We don't provide the 'easy to program for' console that they [developers] want, because 'easy to program for' means that anybody will be able to take advantage of pretty much what the hardware can do, so the question is what do you do for the rest of the nine and half years? It's a learning process. - SCEI president Kaz Hirai

It's a virus where you buy it and you play it with your friends and they're like, "Oh my God that's so cool, I'm gonna go buy it." So you stop playing it after two months, but they buy it and they stop playing it after two months but they've showed it to someone else who then go out and buy it and so on. Everyone I know bought one and nobody turns it on. - Epic Games president Mike Capps

We have a real culture of thrift. The goal that I had in bringing a lot of the packaged goods folks into Activision about 10 years ago was to take all the fun out of making video games. - Activision CEO Bobby Kotick

 

Around the Network
leo-j said:
ubisoft never suported the wii for anything which is a shame really.

 The thing is they did, Red Steel and Rayman. Those games are still the best selling 3rd party games on Wii. I did expect Ubi to make a sequal on both and maybythrow in some other game.



 

 

Buy it and pray to the gods of Sigs: Naznatips!

The Wii got Pimped!!!! WEEEEEEEEEE



  Unleash The Beast!  

End of 2011 Sales: Wii = 90mil, 360 = 61mil, PS3= 60mil

sinha said:
naznatips said:
sinha said:
naznatips said:
I suppose I really don't care if that's what Ubisoft thinks, because we have already seen what happens to the random shit casual games thrown at the Wii (Boogie). If it takes developers another year to figure out that this crap doesn't sell, that's their loss.

That's possible. Or the lesson they may learn if these Boogie-type games fail is that third party games don't sell all that well on the Wii, period.

The question is: will they go from making cheap casual games to higher quality casual games, or will they go from making cheap casual games to even cheaper casual games... or even no games?



3.) Stop developing on the Wii and only make games on the 360 and PS3. This option could have three results:
a) If 3rd parties do this, the PS3 will not get any non-multiplatform games, and the system will die. As it stands, the PS3 completely depends on 3rd party Wii games selling if it wants any 3rd party exclusives. Otherwise companies can not survive making exclusive games on it. It's too much of a business risk. The PS3 will not survive with no exclusive games. If it leeches everything off of the 360, people will simply buy the 360 instead because it's cheaper.


"As it stands, the PS3 completely depends on 3rd party Wii games selling if it wants any 3rd party exclusives."

I don't get what you mean by this, can you elaborate? Are you saying if 3rd party Wii games don't sell, the PS3 won't get any 3rd party exclusives? Why wouldn't it?

 

"The PS3 will not survive with no exclusive games."

True.

 

"If it leeches everything off of the 360, people will simply buy the 360 instead because it's cheaper."

I think this part is already coming true to some extent in NA (all of the 360-PS3 games get better review scores and sell more units on the 360).


I do believe that developers will sometimes fund the "big ambitious project" even if they don't expect it to make money. The PS3 can do fairly well if it gets some of these big projects as exclusive games which utilize the full space of Blu-ray to make them true PS3 exclusives. However, if the 3rd party developers are trying to survive off of only making PS3 and 360 games, there is no way they are going to have the cash to make a PS3 exclusive game. Maybe a company like Take Two can, with the kind of cash they get on GTA, but Take Two is having huge financial trouble this generation as well. They are having even more with Manhunt's AO rating.

Edit: I should point out that there is quite a lot of evidence that this is true.  Sony's biggest remaining 3rd party exclusives (MGS4 and FFXIII) are both being made by companies with strong Wii support.  Konami already has many Wii games made and in development (Granted they aren't all good) and an as yet unnamed Wii RPG (hopefully we will see it at TGS) as well as a statement from Kojima that it's the system he wants to work on after MGS4.  Square Enix has 2 big Wii games already (Dragon Quest Swords and Final Fantasy CC:CB) and the promise of more to be shown in the near future. 

Now, people may say that the PS3 can survive of Sony's first and second party exclusive games, but Sony is not Nintendo. The Wii is going to sell like crazy with or without 3rd party support. We have already seen that in the first 9 months of it's life. However, look at the PS3 games that were expected to be huge hits from Sony's first and second party this year. Lair, Heavenly Sword, and Warhawk have all been given very mixed reviews. Mixed reviews don't sell systems. Sony needs that strong 3rd party support to survive.

I wouldn't call it a death sentence, there are companies making non-Wii games and somehow surviving

Can you name any companies that are not making any Wii games, or have not announced any Wii games? I suppose Epic isn't going to be making any Wii games, but epic's games are almost always funded directly by the company who's system they are making the game for (Sony or Microsoft), so they don't ever have to worry about games flopping. I mean, you could argue that developers did fine on the 360 before the Wii was released, but even then developers kept up strong PS2 support to keep afloat. A 360 title is in no way guarunteed to sell well, nor is a PS3 and 360 title (The Darkness). It's not that a Wii title (or for that matter a PS2 title) is, but your odds of making a profit are a lot better. You spend much less time and money making the game, and you need to sell fewer copies to make a profit.

As I said, I'm not sure how this will work out for Ubisoft, or if they will even act in this manner. It wouldn't make much sense for them to do so, considering their cheap cash-ins flopped (Blazing Angels, Prince of Persia remake, Farcry, Driver remake, GT Pro, Surf's Up, etc.) while their high budget from the ground up Wii titles (Rayman Raving Rabbids, Red Steel) were very successful. Not to mention their announced future Wii games don't show them going down this path (RRR2 as a Wii exclusive, Nitrobike, Red Steel 2). It will be interesting to see if they really do only make cheap Wii games, or if they make a mix of both, which is what it seems they are doing at the moment.



jhlennon1 said:
Smashchu said:
jhlennon1 said:
Smashchu said:
They can't ignore the Wii. That's retarted. The thing is that the good 3rd party games will sell, and the bad ones will flop. The ones who developer only for ther 360/PS3 lose money(or miss out on it). It's evolution. The strongest will, again, survive.

Correction. All the companies will "survive"...


WTH? The Wii is the fastest selling console ever and will negativly affect the speed at which PS3s/360s sell. Not supporting the system is a death sentence, and poorly made games will hurt the comapny.


So are Epic dead? Get your head out of your ass. There is more money to be made with the Wii but it's not the only way to survive as Wii fans are sure to find out. If you haven't noticed yet, Sony and Microsoft financially support companies who make games for their systems.

Would you have said the same thing last generation with the PS2. You know, there are very few companies out there that make just PC games. The onces who actually focus on it has somewhat of a strangle hold on the market. Their games are always high sellers selling better then most console games. This is becuase PC gamers are more loyal to a set company ansd their games.

But consoles are not the same way. Gamers are fickly, and can be easily swaed(spelling?). Look at most of the major publishers last year. Was there any out there, besides Nintendo and Microsoft who didn't support the PS2. It would be hard to find one that's for sure. And I can tell you that those companies "tried" to make good games for the system(I say tried as not all games are dested for greatness). Not supporting the Wii is a big mistake. Ubisoft will eventually relized, as with all game developers, that you Wii games need tio be good, or you can't fund your big games. And games for just the 360/PS3 are not going to make back the money you lost on development. In fact, look at all the developers lining up to the Wii. Their smart. They know they can't leave it alone. Even Rockstar is making Wii games. I think I can safely say that not supporting the Wii is not going to help in the long run.



Around the Network

I decided a while ago..; you are not getting on more dime from me UBI, no chance.

If you some how manage to make a game I can't live without you can rest asured I will wait and buy it used.

 Cheers.

 

 



I would have to say ubisoft has done very well off the 360, look at the clancy series of games, im sure they paid for themselves and helped dilute ps3 costs, and cover the costs of crap like red steel. if anything, they should use 360 sales to help better polish both wii games and ps3 games. though profits from each copy sold would be nice to know so we could do a real break down.



come play minecraft @  mcg.hansrotech.com

minecraft name: hansrotec

XBL name: Goddog

didn't read all the post... but IMO on the console I have and PC it's one of the best company in the world regarding the quantity of game they are doing and the average quality of it.... because it's easy to be a great studio if you do a game every 5 years....

I don't like EA... but for me the world record of crap it's activision they have great titles.... but damn they have the longest list of crap that even my grand ma wouldn't buy even if she doesn't know shit about VG....

but I guess it's a question of opinion....

and he is not saying they are going to do crappy games on Wii he is saying they are making enough money with them to invest on what has more production cost... basically WHAT ANY COMPANY IN THE WORLD IS DOING....

P.S. : yeap i'm back :P



YESSSS!!!! so cool!!!!! Ubisoft uses the money they earn from Wii games and make real good Xbox 360 games!!! WOOOHOOO!!!!



ceres said:
So basically... this means there's no hope for Red Steel 2 having any serious development behind it to make it what they originally hyped the first to be?

Why? people will buy it anyways...

Stop buying shitty games and they'll stop making them...... and if you believe that one, have I got something to sell you, haha