By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Is Killzone 2 in danger of falling below 90 on metacritic ?

blazinhead89 on 03 February 2009
makingmusic476 said:
Squilliam said:
gebx said:
Squilliam said:
Actually 92 is about the level it needs to fall before people unwrap their crow sandwiches. That would put the game under Gears of War 1/2. Im serious about this too, such is the hype of this game that people will feel justified jumping on it for a score below Gears of War, especially as it has been hyped as the 2nd coming by some people.

Seriously? Those people give 360 fanboys a bad name... ;)

 
  • Epic delivered twice in less time two better games.
  • Not a Halo killer
  • 4 years+ in development for...
  • With high graphics scores the gameplay must be lacking compared to...
  • All that hype? I expected a better score..

Thats some of the killing points which may be made... etc.

Its like that Red Dwarf episode "Future Echoes" from season 1.

 

I never expected this from you of all people.

 


Ban Him;) @BigFatJ, So does that mean Fable 2 Is not AAA?

Around the Network
mesoteto on 03 February 2009

@blazin--i call it here fable to is far from AAA---worse game i have played this gen

near the end there i was pulling teeth to beat it



 

Darc Requiem on 03 February 2009

As long as the game is good does it really matter?



blazinhead89 on 03 February 2009

^Mesototo, I have not played Fable II , but 1 point difference is tiny, 89 or 90, it is still the same game we PS3 owners will be playing. Uncharted Is AAA imo.



Phrancheyez on 03 February 2009
Darc Requiem said:
As long as the game is good does it really matter?

 

In reality, no.

In cyberspace...



Around the Network
mesoteto on 03 February 2009

i say give fable 2 q try but i was disappointed, i loved the first one but this ones just seems to be missing something

i dont think i wil flip it back on to even go after the extra achievements



 

Darc Requiem on 03 February 2009
Phrancheyez said:
Darc Requiem said:
As long as the game is good does it really matter?

 

In reality, no.

In cyberspace...

 

I could careless about cyberspace. A game could have a 100 metacritic score but if I don't enjoy playing it, it does me no good.



Phrancheyez on 03 February 2009
Darc Requiem said:
Phrancheyez said:
Darc Requiem said:
As long as the game is good does it really matter?

 

In reality, no.

In cyberspace...

 

I could careless about cyberspace. A game could have a 100 metacritic score but if I don't enjoy playing it, it does me no good.

Precisely.  So there's your answer=P  Unfortunately, that question has a different answer depending on who you ask.  As for me, I'm in your boat.

 



coolestguyever on 03 February 2009

It doesn't matter. IGN gave it a 94 and Gamespot gave it 100. Those are the only 2 I care about.



coolestguyever on 03 February 2009
blazinhead89 said:
makingmusic476 said:
Squilliam said:
gebx said:
Squilliam said:
Actually 92 is about the level it needs to fall before people unwrap their crow sandwiches. That would put the game under Gears of War 1/2. Im serious about this too, such is the hype of this game that people will feel justified jumping on it for a score below Gears of War, especially as it has been hyped as the 2nd coming by some people.

Seriously? Those people give 360 fanboys a bad name... ;)

 
  • Epic delivered twice in less time two better games.
  • Not a Halo killer
  • 4 years+ in development for...
  • With high graphics scores the gameplay must be lacking compared to...
  • All that hype? I expected a better score..

Thats some of the killing points which may be made... etc.

Its like that Red Dwarf episode "Future Echoes" from season 1.

 

I never expected this from you of all people.

 

 

Ban Him;) @BigFatJ, So does that mean Fable 2 Is not AAA?

1. Gears of War 1/2 suck ass. Including the water effects which were supposed to be marvellous.

2. Killzone 2 graphics are better than Gears 2 graphics.

3. Gears of War 1 and 2 were both hella hyped.