By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - AMD vs Intell processors

GrotesqueOne on 27 January 2009

j/w

is there much of a difference between the 2?

does one have better quality/efficiency/performance than the other?

which do you perfer and why.



Around the Network
NintendoMan on 27 January 2009

I prefer AMD, no particular reason. I just seemed to have had better luck with AMD than Intel.



Manchester United 2008-09 Season - Trophies & Records

Barclays Premier League 2008-09: 1st // UEFA Champions League 2008-09: Finals (Yet To Play) // FIFA Club World Cup: Winners // UEFA Super Cup: Runners-up // FA Cup: Semi-Finals // League (Carling) Cup: Winners // FA (Charity) Community Shield: Winners
Records: First British Team To Win FIFA Club World Cup, New Record for No. Of Consecutive Clean Sheets In Premier League, New English & British League Records for Minutes Without Conceding, New Record For Going Undeafeated In Champions League (25 games ongoing), First British Team To Beat FC Porto In Portugal, First Club To Defeat Arsenal At The Emirates In European Competition, First Team In English League Football History To Win 3 Titles Back To Back On Two Seperate Ocassions
epsilon72 on 27 January 2009

Basically, it boils down to this:
If you want the best performance but don't mind paying more, go Intel.
If you're looking for "best bang for your buck" and are okay with decent performance, go AMD.

I use AMD, because my budget is limited and I don't need blazing fast speeds.  For gaming a videocard is much more important than the CPU anyways.



FJ-Warez on 27 January 2009
epsilon72 said:

Basically, it boils down to this:
If you want the best performance but don't mind paying more, go Intel.
If you're looking for "best bang for your buck" and are okay with decent performance, go AMD.

I use AMD, because my budget is limited and I don't need blazing fast speeds.  For gaming a videocard is much more important than the CPU anyways.

 

This, basically, Intel offer the best performance, but the AMD platforms are cheaper... somehow the intel-compatible motherboars are more expensive.



By me:

Made with Blender + LuxRender
"Since you can´t understand ... there is no point to taking you seriously."
Viper1 on 27 January 2009

I've preferred Intel since release of the Core 2 Duo architecture.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Around the Network
Rnfmonline on 28 January 2009

I had both AMD and Intel, and there just as good as eachother.



drpunk on 28 January 2009

The both browse the internet and play porn videos adequately.



Serious_frusting on 28 January 2009
Viper1 said:
I've preferred Intel since release of the Core 2 Duo architecture.

ditto since then for me it was all about AMD.

Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

nintendo792612 on 28 January 2009

i don't even know if there is a differance lol



consoles i own ps12 gba ds gc wii

Mummelmann on 28 January 2009

Def prefer Intel, it costs only marginally more now (at least here) and they're more solid and a lot better suited for overclocking and serious juice imo.