By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Forza 2 Outdone By GT5 Physics

NJ5 said:
NinjaKido said:

I don't feel like explaining my point because I feel that what it meant was self evident but since you won't let it rest i'll have to . 9.X million people felt satisfied with playing on two discs 10 years ago because that was the norm then , those same people might not be contempt with switching discs 10 years down the line with advancements in technology which potentialy eliminate the need for disc switching .

 

It's still the norm now too. Almost 74 million current-gen consoles use DVD, almost 20 million use Blu-Ray.

Last time I checked 99,9999999% of PCs don't even have a Blu-Ray drive.



Around the Network
Onyxmeth said:
NinjaKido said:

I don't feel like explaining my point because I feel that what it meant was self evident but since you won't let it rest i'll have to . 9.X million people felt satisfied with playing on two discs 10 years ago because that was the norm then , those same people might not be contempt with switching discs 10 years down the line with advancements in technology which potentialy eliminate the need for disc switching .

"You sound like someone that wasn't even gaming at the time. Multidisk game were a gigantic badge of honor and an effective marketing tool. People back then weren't praising RPGs for how few discs they could cram them into. They were praising them for how many discs long they would end up being. Two discs were better than one disc. Three discs were better than two discs. Four discs were better than three discs. MGS, RE2 and GT 2 all benefitted from being on multiple discs because there was more game in them. Maybe games in the old days just had a better mentality that more game was worth the burden of getting off your ass and switching discs every ten hours or so."

The times of the walkman or the cassette player ? I don't see how people being satisfied with something gives a strong case for us being satisfied with it now . We live in the times of portability and minimalism , we don't carry music albulms in pouches anymore we carry MP3 players , we don't carry essays , coursework and documentation if there isn't a need because we have USB sticks , Hard drives , online servers etc .

We don't enjoy switching discs if we don't have to because we have the luxury of 1 disc , hopefully at one point we won't need any discs but there's a few obstacles before we get there . The transition from many to 1 shows progression , less is more now days and it gives us added convenience.

I don't think i'll debate much more with you onyx , you defend the XBOX 360 like crazy and I don't think the discussion would reach a conclusion of any sort.

 

The difference in your examples with music is that there have been advancements in the tech while the songs have stayed the same size. Songs don't get any larger as the tech gets simpler, so it's nothing but benefit. DVD to Blu Ray movies should show that advancing technology does little to get rid of multidiscs and people don't care. Multi disc Blu Rays are very popular.

As gaming formats advance, the games get larger. No generation since that 10 years past with GT2 has not had multidisc games. Last generation both Dreamcast and Gamecube had many games going over one disc. This generation the 360 has inherited it. Advancing the tech is merely to keep pace so multidiscs don't become too numerous. To say that it was more acceptable 10 years ago, when it never had a stopping point is ridiculous. Forza seems to be singled out here when it's merely just another in a continuing chain.

 

 

No the distinction your making isn't a relevant one , when I talk about the transition from multi disk to single disk i'm not reffering to the 50 GB's of space that give you X% performance advantage over DVD i'm talking about the added convenience brought about by technological advancement.

And saying "multi disks Blu rays are very popular" are you trying to imply that they perform better because they are multi disk ? give up...

Why are you mentioning movies i'm baffled....we all know the many HD TV Series's have much bigger space requirments than a single blu-ray , a game this generation will probably never need to exceed the limitations of a Blu-Ray disc unless the game producer is overly ambitous like Kojima  . It's funny how XBOX 360 supporters will cry about how games don't need more than 7gbs when the blu-rays technical abilities are boasted about , now that I talk about the ease of use and convenience of the blu-ray your saying that it's still not enough for this gens gaming requirments...where does that leave the 360's DVD ?.

Let's get something straight onyx we'll never need more than one 50GB blu-ray disc this gen , that's certain and mostly indisputable .



but we are talking about console and all ps3 come with a blu ray drive and games on only one disc.



Katilian said:
NinjaKido said:

Yes i'm sure there are also 100's of millions of CD players in use would we say that MP3 wasn't the norm ? the prior does negate the latter if it has reached a certain level of penatration , I think with the mass availibility and use of blu-ray technology it would be safe to say blu has reached that level.

I think you'd find that level of penatration is after it has surpassed the current weekly sales of the technology it is replacing, not while the previous technology is still heavily outselling it.

That's not true , Blu-ray doesn't have to exceed DVD usage to be considered the "norm" . Maybe it would need to outpace blu-ray to be considered "popular" or the "standard" but the "norm" is something entirely different.

In the UK people playing Cricket is the "norm", football is the most popular sport here.

In the UK watch documentaries is the "norm" , reality TV shows however are far more popular ?

 

understand now ?

 



NinjaKido said:

 

No the distinction your making isn't a relevant one , when I talk about the transition from multi disk to single disk i'm not reffering to the 50 GB's of space that give you X% performance advantage over DVD i'm talking about the added convenience brought about by technological advancement.

And saying "multi disks Blu rays are very popular" are you trying to imply that they perform better because they are multi disk ? give up...

Why are you mentioning movies i'm baffled....we all know the many HD TV Series's have much bigger space requirments than a single blu-ray , a game this generation will probably never need to exceed the limitations of a Blu-Ray disc unless the game producer is overly ambitous like Kojima  . It's funny how XBOX 360 supporters will cry about how games don't need more than 7gbs when the blu-rays technical abilities are boasted about , now that I talk about the ease of use and convenience of the blu-ray your saying that it's still not enough for this gens gaming requirments...where does that leave the 360's DVD ?.

Let's get something straight onyx we'll never need more than one 50GB blu-ray disc this gen , that's certain and mostly indisputable .

You must have missed my point in it's entirety. I posted the GT2 picture up to show that nobody cares that a game is multidisc. There is no correlation between being mutidisc and losing sales. Blu Rays do fine. DVDs do fine. Games do fine. So why is it laughable(more to radha than to you) that Forza 3 might be on two discs? Also why is it so different today that multidiscs are so unacceptable? Most 360 owners don't have a PS3, so any correlation between the formats won't happen with most consumers.

I also never said Blu Ray isn't enough for gaming. I spoke about Blu Ray movies and compared them to gaming tech to show that it's not the same as music, which has nothing to do with this topic since it's a different scenario. I showed how industries with advancing file sizes and formats like movies and games merely try to keep pace, but they never advance very far. Two disc DVD sets are usually also two disc Blu Ray sets. There are multidisc games for every gen that has had discs because there is always a format or two that cannot handle some of the largest games on one disc. Odds are this will continue next generation too.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Around the Network

I give up...what ever. You win.



Lets extrapolate a little here, to make the point clear. If Forza 3 came on CDs, would that be okay? Is it, in any way, not as cool as coming on just 2 DVDs instead?  Especially, you know, if your console has something of a disc-scratching history?

I don't think there's a large measure of extra goodness to having 1 disc instead of 2. That being said, having 1 disc is nicer, when it comes down to it. The discussion has far exceeded the importance of the issue, for this particular game, however. If Forza was going to come on 5 DVDs, it'd be a different story altogether. But... its just 2. That's okay. Not optimal, but its okay.

I think the discussion is really more about GT physics, as compared to Forza physics, isn't it?



NinjaKido said:
I give up...what ever. You win.

Cool. Thanks man.

@Groucho-The article was shown to prove nothing because the author didn't understand the first thing about drifting, so the conversation wasn't going to go anywhere. Notice not one GT supporter actually vouched for the video or tried a counter argument to those claiming it was bullshit. Most answers came down to a single way of thinking "GT is better because it's GT, no reasoning required".

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



RED53DEVILS said:

There is no doubt in my mind that Forza 2 is an excellent racing game. Some can even say that it is the best racing game out right now, and I agree, Forza 2 has a lot going for it: good customization, hot paint jobs, a nice online trading system, engine swaps etc. But the thing is, some people want to believe that it has better driving physics than Gran Turismo 5, and they are truly mistaken.

Although driving in Forza 2 may seem real, let’s take a look at the DRIVING physics of each game. Here is a video of the drifting in Forza 2 (Rear Wheel Drive) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OK1mDXoR2I&feature=related notice how when drifting in Forza 2, you do not have to turn before you drift (how you just slide right into the drift) well… this is absolutely the wrong DRIVING PHYSICS. If you can just drift around a 180 degree turn just by hitting the E-brake, that is incorrect, period. That is not how car physics work. Here is a video of Gran Turismo 5 (All Wheel Drive) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qFl_vMS17I&feature=related notice how he takes the standard maneuver on turning before he drifts, that is the REAL way to drift in REAL life. Here is a video of REAL drifting in REAL life http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZMcDLUHDzQ&feature=related notice how they take the same maneuver before they drift (as seen in Gran Turismo 5 video) that my friends is how it is done in Gran Turismo 5 and in REAL LIFE. For instance, learning to drift in Forza 2, took me no time at all, it required little skill besides knowing when to start sliding. Any of you that have played Gran Turismo would understand that it takes a lot of practice to learn how to drift in Gran Turismo. It takes time and effort to know even the basics. I am not saying that Forza 2 has bad physics, in fact they are really good, just not to the accuracy of Gran Turismo 5. Both have their pros and cons, but when it comes to the physics, Forza 2 is outdone by Gran Turismo 5. This why the pros turn to the Gran Turismo series to practice their maneuvers, timing, breaking, turning, etc.

http://www.thegameraccess.com/2009/01/forza-2-outdone-by-gt5-physics/

Post this when:
A.  GT5 is actually released and ANYONE has played it to comment.
B.  When the GT series stops rewarding you for bouncing off walls and other vehicles.  This is the pinnacle lack of realism.

 



Onyxmeth said:
NinjaKido said:
I give up...what ever. You win.

Cool. Thanks man.

@Groucho-The article was shown to prove nothing because the author didn't understand the first thing about drifting, so the conversation wasn't going to go anywhere. Notice not one GT supporter actually vouched for the video or tried a counter argument to those claiming it was bullshit. Most answers came down to a single way of thinking "GT is better because it's GT, no reasoning required".

 

Hmm yes, good points.

 

Well, if its back to the DVD vs BD argument... you don't "win", sorry. =)  Its a minor issue in this case, but yes, BD, and a lower disc count is better, again particularly when the manufacturer of the multi-disc console has not put foam bumpers on, to prevent impact damage during minor bumps.  I don't see how that's really something that can be denied as basic fact -- however, its not a major issue for most adult 360 owners, who aren't as likely to bump into their entertainment center, etc. while anticipating an irritating disc swap.

You can argue all day long about how 1080p isn't much better than 720p as well -- but in the end, it is for some people, and the reverse is never true -- especially if your 720p TV is somehow cheaply made in such a way that damages it when its trying to scale a 1080p image to fit or somesuch.

Multi-DVDs also increase packaging and manufacturing costs, resulting in less profit -- so the answer to "are games going the way of BD" is a resounding "yup", no matter what you may like to believe.  This same issue is what drives the movie industry, and the retail industry, to push BD so hard (they devote way more shelf space to it than its current marketshare justifies)... An entire SD TV season on one disc instead of 6?  Yup, profit increase, check.  Less shelf space per unit of valuable, high-margin inventory?  Yup, check.  Retail will take that.