And it's kind of creepy you almost said the same thing as I did >_>

FREAK!

Halo 3 has also gone for a completely different art style so...stupid comparison

Halo 3 does 4 player offline split screen/coop.

Killzone 2 does 1 player offline....

Obviously to someone who loves offline multi-player one is far superior to the other, can you guess which one?

Also consider more than 2/3rds of people in America play offline multi-player, factor that when you consider than only 20% of console gamers play online when you consider marketability.

(Still buying the hot metal box Killzone 2 first day)

Yeah Halo 3 looks pretty bad. It's a good game but still looks like shit near many others FPSs. And the game still runs at lower res because the X360 GPU can't keep with HDR + high-res. The same happened to Oblivion.

I don't see how you guys can differentiate. They both look almost exactly the same >_> I can't choose.... 

Double post...

my god, killzone2 makes halo3 looks like a wii game.


i kid i kid - don't shoot me please. xD

Doom wins by a hair. Really close, though... >_>

I like it how he compares Killzone 2 SP to Halo 3 MP and that not even with one picture where you can see a gun in first person.......

Umm, the production timing kills the argument, also most of the halo shot were from multi player, which everyone with half a brain knows that multi players suffer from frame rate drops, and most importantly, who cares. having a polished game with nice graphics does add to the enjoyment, but lets talk 1 - 2 years after killzone 2 is released. aand then we'll compare staying power