Heh, I didn't realize that you could do that. Ya learn something new everyday I guess.
Whenever the quotes got too outta hand I always just started anew with a (for example) "@vlad" . The More you Know!
Heh, I didn't realize that you could do that. Ya learn something new everyday I guess.
Whenever the quotes got too outta hand I always just started anew with a (for example) "@vlad" . The More you Know!
I've always used the delete quote, pretty useful...now, if you can teach us how did you break the OP, that'd be very interesting to know

So when giant requoted quotes are requoted and requoted again and again, there was actually no need?
Now we find it!

Most people don't actually bother to see what all the WYSIWYG buttons do so... only a few people actually knew how to kill quotes.
You can delete quotes easily even without the delete row button. That's what I always do.
At least it works with my firefox 3 version.
This is invisible text!
| zexen_lowe said: I've always used the delete quote, pretty useful...now, if you can teach us how did you break the OP, that'd be very interesting to know |
I would suggest it may be another one of the old threads that people posted in before they started.
Somone found out last year that you could make a post in a thread that hadn't been made yet (Like this thread is 56665 if you look at the forum code)
So occasionally we came acros threads where the OP was actually the second poster..... perhaps this is the result of ioi deleting all the "future" comments.

TWRoO said:
I would suggest it may be another one of the old threads that people posted in before they started.
|
Oh, thanks, I think I got it.
So, we should look out for thread numbers that are likely to be posted in...like 60000, for example, they have a good chance of being broken, right?

| zexen_lowe said: Oh, thanks, I think I got it. So, we should look out for thread numbers that are likely to be posted in...like 60000, for example, they have a good chance of being broken, right?
|
Perhaps... but some random ones were taken, and I think any 1*10^n threads too, as well as (1*10^n)-1

About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.


