I have heard about two posible scenarios:
1) The hardcore apocaliptic one which I disagree with. According to this vision, developers and publishers will stop creating deep inmersive games with great graphics and thousands of hours of gameplay and start developing shallow simple flash pick and play games. Why? Because the userbase of the HD consoles will be to small compared to the Wii and DS, so it will be faster and more profitable to produce games for consumers like our moms who can be easyly satisfied with very simple games. The realism in the graphics and design required to satisfy the small "hardcore" HD userbase will be slower and too expensive to develop. As a result there will be hundreds of casual games and no more GTA's, Gears, Final Fantasies, Zeldas and so on simple because it will be a bad business. The end of gaming as we know it.
2) The Casual and hardcore "everyone wins" scenario which I tend to agree with. The logic of this vision is based on the market economy and a comparison some people make with other entertainment businesses like the films industry. Thanks to Nintendo and the expansion of the Market, it will be more resources to produce more and different kinds of games. People who didn't buy Video games is doing it now and will continue to do it. There will be more houses with video games consoles, different kinds of them, and gamig is going to be seen like a social, healthy, good for you and everyone's activity. Just like the movies, publishers and developers will create games for different audiences but they will still have games like Gran Turismo, Mass Effect, Metroid Prime, etc, to satisfy the most "hardcore" tastes. In fact, the next generation all consoles will be HD and will have some kind on motion sensor controller so every kind of game can be played on them.
So... Which one of this two possible futures do you see more likely to become a reality?
1) The apocaliptic one?
2) Or the "everybody wins" one?
And more importantly ...WHY?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |















