By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - Give high posting VGCharters the power to give 1 day bans?

amp316 said:
No way. Someone like colonelstubbs would ban me for no reason.

 

 Damn straight! Id ban you right now bitch!

j/k



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot

Around the Network

I have a better idea. We can put the VG$ to good use. 1 day = $500 (note, user bans don't take away other users money)




If you drop a PS3 right on top of a Wii, it would definitely defeat it. Not so sure about the Xbox360. - mancandy
In the past we played games. In the future we watch games. - Forest-Spirit
11/03/09 Desposit: Mod Bribery (RolStoppable)  vg$ 500.00
06/03/09 Purchase: Moderator Privilege  vg$ -50,000.00

Nordlead Jr. Photo/Video Gallery!!! (Video Added 4/19/10)

colonelstubbs said:
amp316 said:
No way. Someone like colonelstubbs would ban me for no reason.

 

 Damn straight! Id ban you right now bitch!

j/k

 

...and I'd ban you for having a guy that plays in a wannabe Bond series as your avatar.  Can't everyone see why this would not work? 



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

I think fanboys should be given the option to give themselves permabans.



 

I'd rather limit the caps of people with 100 (or 500) or less posts. No images, or even no HTML.

How about a "rating" system for posts? People can give a thumbs up/thumbs down, and if a user/post gets enough thumbs downs... it gets hidden/blocked?



Gesta Non Verba

Nocturnal is helping companies get cheaper game ratings in Australia:

Game Assessment website

Wii code: 2263 4706 2910 1099

Around the Network
shams said:
I'd rather limit the caps of people with 100 (or 500) or less posts. No images, or even no HTML.

How about a "rating" system for posts? People can give a thumbs up/thumbs down, and if a user/post gets enough thumbs downs... it gets hidden/blocked?

or better yet, we use the power of VG$ to influence posts. $100 to edit the post. $10 to block/show.

(yes, I am trying to buy my power)

 




If you drop a PS3 right on top of a Wii, it would definitely defeat it. Not so sure about the Xbox360. - mancandy
In the past we played games. In the future we watch games. - Forest-Spirit
11/03/09 Desposit: Mod Bribery (RolStoppable)  vg$ 500.00
06/03/09 Purchase: Moderator Privilege  vg$ -50,000.00

Nordlead Jr. Photo/Video Gallery!!! (Video Added 4/19/10)

No. It's the work of mods and there is no reason that users will have to do it.



It'd be better to hire more mods instead. They actually take the stuff seriously, for the most part. Allowing powers due to posting amount only means spammers and non serious people have an easy time, and it would encourage even more spamming.

Is my opinion anyway.



This is invisible text!

shams said:
I'd rather limit the caps of people with 100 (or 500) or less posts. No images, or even no HTML.

How about a "rating" system for posts? People can give a thumbs up/thumbs down, and if a user/post gets enough thumbs downs... it gets hidden/blocked?

The rating system sounds good, most sites implement them well, though it may be abused to the extreme, for example, if I go into a Halo discussion thread and say I don't like it and give my reasons for it in a rational post, it may be voted down just 'cause my opinion is "impopular". But in most sites the rating up/down works pretty well, so it may not be a real problem. Jus be sure that not every average joe can vote up/down, maybe require some number of posts (100 sounds good)

Though I'm still partial to the idea of letting normal users give 1 day ban, 5000+ posts and no bans sounds fine for me

 




You joking? high post counts dont mean they know what they talking about. Dumb idea