The Ghost of RubangB said:
But this isn't about 3 giant companies duking it out like sports teams or politicians. This is about 3 giant companies, a dozen large companies, and tons of small companies making interactive games and stories and simulators and trying to sell them to us. I want reviewers to be educated about game history, storytelling, visual art, music, film editing, and some sort of art analysis. Game reviewers usually only know about the last generation or 2, and only about their favorite few genres. Almost all my classes right now are about critical analysis of films in tons of retarded ways, basically training me to become a film critic. It doesn't make my opinions better, but I think it makes me better at expressing my opinions without being a total dooshbag like every game reviewer out there. And I have to study every genre of film and learn how to discuss them differently. If somebody's been playing games for 5-10 years and has played every shooter there is but only 1 or 2 casual games which they absolutely hate, they shouldn't be reviewing games, and they should be at a niche site where they review shooters only. These reviewers know nothing about games, art, journalism, or critical analysis. Grampy's even discovered that one of them doesn't read at all and can't even spell tacos or spaghetti, his own favorite foods.
But the fact that they want to call themselves "core gamers" even though they are the smallest hardcore niche nobody cares about is offensive on its own. It just shows that they want to pretend they're the entire game industry, when they're just the tiniest but loudest crybaby segment of gamers. They hope that if they can yell on the internet louder than Nintendo fans, that they'll stay relevant. What business do "hardcore" gamers have even talking about casual games they know nothing about? They have constantly defined themselves as good and casual games/gamers as bad, so why do they need to fuck up Metacritic with all their hate? They just dive on casual games like fanboys on the IMDB ratings. When a hardcore reviewer tells me a casual game sucks because it's casual, or sucks because it's just minigames, their entire "informed opinion" boils down to "This game sucks because it succeeds at its goals." If a game is intended to be casual, or intended to be minigames, then that is not a bad thing at all. I haven't seen a film reviewer praising every action film and hating every comedy and documentary that comes out.
I think Sky Render aced it right here. I agree with every part of this except the end. In the 80's every game that came out WAS rad and awesome. |
Right on man, the videogaming industry is starting to become like the movie industry. You have the elites who only like "certain" types of films, they say they are better and give them oscars. But a majority of movie dollars goes to the mainstream.
but ever once in a while there is a movie that is appreciated by both, that is when you get a Titantic, or Dark Knight... in the videogames industry that would be Halo, GTA, Zelda, Mario and a few others.
End of 2009 Predictions (Set, January 1st 2009)
Wii- 72 million 3rd Year Peak, better slate of releases
360- 37 million Should trend down slightly after 3rd year peak
PS3- 29 million Sales should pick up next year, 3rd year peak and price cut








Next Gen


