Killzone 2 is getting hyped as some sort of PS3 savior. One question on here even asked if the the XBox 360 could survive KZ2's "onslaught". Anyone, can someone give any reason why Killzone 2 should have more sales than Resistance 2? Please let me know where I am wrong regarding any of the following and if I missed anything:
1. At this point and time Resistance seems to be the flagship FPS for the PS3, already having two titles in the franchise. Killzone appeared once on the PS2, and while had solid voice acting, didn't burn up the charts or make a difference.
2. Resistance 2 was promoted by Sony for the Christmas season. KZ2 is to be released during an arguably slow time of the year.
3. KZ2 is the subject of industry jokes of how pre-rendered videos were marketed as actual gameplay. This is an embarrassing stigma. And while the latest clip looks promising, can anyone argue that it is "lightyears" beyond what was saw in Gears 2?
Given all these, can someone indicate why Killzone 2 would supplant the Resistance franchise as the flagship franchise and outsell it? And, as far as being a gamechanger, a second question would be: Why would Killzone 2 happen to end up causing console FPS fans to buy a PS3 over a 360? Is it because KZ2 is supposed to have bots? Doesn't Gears 2 have bots? I don't see it. KZ2 is by some developer most of the world doesn't even know, while Halo had been by Bungie, and Gears by Epic, both of whom are known far more than the developer of Killzone.
Can someone answer these? And thus explain why KZ2 will outsell Resistance and also be a game changer to result in Sony getting an edge in games?