By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Monster Hunter G ported to Wii... Famitsu Scan...

ClaudeLv250 said:
xlost7 said:
Soriku said:
I'd think people who are excited about MH3 are excited about the main attraction--ie. online--over the single player.

Yes and you are correct, but is Nintendo's Wii service ideal for the Monster Hunter online portion? Do you think Capcom will incorpate a online portion in the American Wii version of MH3?

I hope so, cause they should of done the same with the PSP versions.

Clearly as you stated more people care about MH multiplayer-wise than they do single-player wise. That's the main attraction I have on this series. I did before and I do now. I lost interest because I would face nearly impossible bosses on my own. But knowing you have a few friends around you and your strategizing new ways to take down this monster. Is that sets Monster Hunter a unique gaming experience.

You think they won't? Even MH1 had online intact when they brought it over, it would be a notable step back for one is one of the game's most advertised features.

Well clearly I'm scared of the friend code aspect. I mean the friend code is neat but what if your friends are not avaliable and you would like to play with other people across the globe. I hope the incorparte that feature similar to how Nintendo did with Super Smash Bros. Brawl.



Around the Network
xlost7 said:
Kasz216 said:
xlost7 said:
@Kasz216

First and foremost you do make sense but what DMeisterJ is saying why would you buy the Wii version and be hyped on it (since you never played it) and you have a clear advantage right now to play it on the PS2. It will be the exact same thing but different control wise on the Wii.

I mean if your hyped on the game and love it right now, then clearly you should just buy the PS2 version, but if you want to wait for the Wii version then wait for the Wii version. I just don't see any point of you two arguing really.

I already stated why.

I've already got a giant backlog of games.

Like seriously... it's huge.

It'd take me a while to get through it all even if i didn't have anything to do.

While for most people... it just makes sense to not get the PS2 version because the main course isn't aviable on the PS2.

 

So your stating that your PS2 library is stacked up and you would just want the Wii version? And the main course is on the PS2 version. Many people today still play Monster Hunter on the PS2. Check the gamefaqs.com forum and look under Monster Hunter for the PS2.

Clearly the game is still going strong. The Wii version is going to be the exact same way.

Nah, more of my gaming backlog is Wii related then Ps2 related.  (Metroid Prime 3 etc)

What i'm saying is... though while i'd be excited to play it... I doubt i'll have time to play it for a good 4-6 months.

 

 



Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Soriku said:

@Kasz

Not to mention MH3 will be the best in the series anyway. I mean...since they're bascally the same I'd like to start out fresh instead of playing the older ones then playing MH3 then going "I've played this before..." and not enjoying it to my fullest since it seems kinda redone already.

Strong words coming from someone who hasn't played the first six itenerations.

>_>

He got that information directly from a self proported expert of the series. 

(You actually.... You basically said all that in this thread other then MH3 will be better.  Though as you stated it's basically going to be the same game but extra stuff.)

I really wouldn't call any of them the best. 

Essentially, they're all the same.

If that's the case, then MH4 will be the best, then 5, and 6.  >_>

Well yeah.  The next is the best when everything is the same but extra content.

Unless the extra content both

A) Sucks

B) Is forced on you.

Which could be a problem for MH3.

It now has co-op local play, but it could easily suck, if you're both stuck in the same area (i.e.: If you are in Area 1, can your local partner be in a different area?).

And now they added water fights, and I hope to god it isn't forced on you, cause that's looking a little sketchy at the moment.



DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Soriku said:

@Kasz

Not to mention MH3 will be the best in the series anyway. I mean...since they're bascally the same I'd like to start out fresh instead of playing the older ones then playing MH3 then going "I've played this before..." and not enjoying it to my fullest since it seems kinda redone already.

Strong words coming from someone who hasn't played the first six itenerations.

>_>

He got that information directly from a self proported expert of the series. 

(You actually.... You basically said all that in this thread other then MH3 will be better.  Though as you stated it's basically going to be the same game but extra stuff.)

I really wouldn't call any of them the best. 

Essentially, they're all the same.

If that's the case, then MH4 will be the best, then 5, and 6.  >_>

hehe, and your correct. They are all the same if any of you actually played the following:

Monster Hunter- PS2
Monster Hunter 2-PS2
Monster Hunter G-PS2

Monster Hunter Freedom
Monster Hunter Freedom 2
Monster Hunter Freedom G

They are all direct ports from each other, especially the PSP versions.

The Wii will be significantly different just for the simple fact Wii controls and its selling of the hardware and some added new features like senery and more monsters.



@Kasz

Well the Wii version is ideal for you :)



Around the Network
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Soriku said:

@Kasz

Not to mention MH3 will be the best in the series anyway. I mean...since they're bascally the same I'd like to start out fresh instead of playing the older ones then playing MH3 then going "I've played this before..." and not enjoying it to my fullest since it seems kinda redone already.

Strong words coming from someone who hasn't played the first six itenerations.

>_>

He got that information directly from a self proported expert of the series. 

(You actually.... You basically said all that in this thread other then MH3 will be better.  Though as you stated it's basically going to be the same game but extra stuff.)

I really wouldn't call any of them the best. 

Essentially, they're all the same.

If that's the case, then MH4 will be the best, then 5, and 6.  >_>

Well yeah.  The next is the best when everything is the same but extra content.

Unless the extra content both

A) Sucks

B) Is forced on you.

Which could be a problem for MH3.

It now has co-op local play, but it could easily suck, if you're both stuck in the same area (i.e.: If you are in Area 1, can your local partner be in a different area?).

And now they added water fights, and I hope to god it isn't forced on you, cause that's looking a little sketchy at the moment.

Who's forcing you to use co-op Local Play?

Though it has Co-op Local play?

That actually makes me a lot more interested in it.  If the PS2 version had co-op local play i'd totally buy that.  While i have a huge backlog of games... i don't have nearly enough Co-op games to play with the Girlfriend.

LBP doesn't have Co-op local does it?

As for the Water sections.  Yeah I'd say that's a too close to call, though if they don't change much i don't see why it'd be forced on you that much.  Since the same stuff should likely be made the same way.

If it follows most games like this path... that stuff will just be part of new stuff.



Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Soriku said:

@Kasz

Not to mention MH3 will be the best in the series anyway. I mean...since they're bascally the same I'd like to start out fresh instead of playing the older ones then playing MH3 then going "I've played this before..." and not enjoying it to my fullest since it seems kinda redone already.

Strong words coming from someone who hasn't played the first six itenerations.

>_>

He got that information directly from a self proported expert of the series. 

(You actually.... You basically said all that in this thread other then MH3 will be better.  Though as you stated it's basically going to be the same game but extra stuff.)

I really wouldn't call any of them the best. 

Essentially, they're all the same.

If that's the case, then MH4 will be the best, then 5, and 6.  >_>

Well yeah.  The next is the best when everything is the same but extra content.

Unless the extra content both

A) Sucks

B) Is forced on you.

Which could be a problem for MH3.

It now has co-op local play, but it could easily suck, if you're both stuck in the same area (i.e.: If you are in Area 1, can your local partner be in a different area?).

And now they added water fights, and I hope to god it isn't forced on you, cause that's looking a little sketchy at the moment.

Who's forcing you to use co-op Local Play?

Though it has Co-op Local play?

That actually makes me a lot more interested in it.  If the PS2 version had co-op local play i'd totally buy that.  While i have a huge backlog of games... i don't have nearly enough Co-op games to play with the Girlfriend.

LBP doesn't have Co-op local does it?

As for the Water sections.  Yeah I'd say that's a too close to call, though if they don't change much i don't see why it'd be forced on you that much.  Since the same stuff should likely be made the same way.

If it follows most games like this path... that stuff will just be part of new stuff.

No one's forcing it, but what if you are using it to play with someone, or you bought the game to play with your sibling and it sucks?

And LBP does have local co-op.



DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Soriku said:

@Kasz

Not to mention MH3 will be the best in the series anyway. I mean...since they're bascally the same I'd like to start out fresh instead of playing the older ones then playing MH3 then going "I've played this before..." and not enjoying it to my fullest since it seems kinda redone already.

Strong words coming from someone who hasn't played the first six itenerations.

>_>

He got that information directly from a self proported expert of the series. 

(You actually.... You basically said all that in this thread other then MH3 will be better.  Though as you stated it's basically going to be the same game but extra stuff.)

I really wouldn't call any of them the best. 

Essentially, they're all the same.

If that's the case, then MH4 will be the best, then 5, and 6.  >_>

Well yeah.  The next is the best when everything is the same but extra content.

Unless the extra content both

A) Sucks

B) Is forced on you.

Which could be a problem for MH3.

It now has co-op local play, but it could easily suck, if you're both stuck in the same area (i.e.: If you are in Area 1, can your local partner be in a different area?).

And now they added water fights, and I hope to god it isn't forced on you, cause that's looking a little sketchy at the moment.

Who's forcing you to use co-op Local Play?

Though it has Co-op Local play?

That actually makes me a lot more interested in it.  If the PS2 version had co-op local play i'd totally buy that.  While i have a huge backlog of games... i don't have nearly enough Co-op games to play with the Girlfriend.

LBP doesn't have Co-op local does it?

As for the Water sections.  Yeah I'd say that's a too close to call, though if they don't change much i don't see why it'd be forced on you that much.  Since the same stuff should likely be made the same way.

If it follows most games like this path... that stuff will just be part of new stuff.

No one's forcing it, but what if you are using it to play with someone, or you bought the game to play with your sibling and it sucks?

And LBP does have local co-op.

Then it's no different then any other game... and still no worse then the other MH games... since those didn't interest you either.  Yet another case where not getting the PS2 version makes sense though.  Thanks for coming around on that.

Ah, bad ass.  Now i need a second controller.  Seems like the kind of game my GF would like.



xlost7 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Soriku said:

@Kasz

Not to mention MH3 will be the best in the series anyway. I mean...since they're bascally the same I'd like to start out fresh instead of playing the older ones then playing MH3 then going "I've played this before..." and not enjoying it to my fullest since it seems kinda redone already.

Strong words coming from someone who hasn't played the first six itenerations.

>_>

He got that information directly from a self proported expert of the series. 

(You actually.... You basically said all that in this thread other then MH3 will be better.  Though as you stated it's basically going to be the same game but extra stuff.)

I really wouldn't call any of them the best. 

Essentially, they're all the same.

If that's the case, then MH4 will be the best, then 5, and 6.  >_>

hehe, and your correct. They are all the same if any of you actually played the following:

Monster Hunter- PS2
Monster Hunter 2-PS2
Monster Hunter G-PS2

Monster Hunter Freedom
Monster Hunter Freedom 2
Monster Hunter Freedom G

They are all direct ports from each other, especially the PSP versions.

The Wii will be significantly different just for the simple fact Wii controls and its selling of the hardware and some added new features like senery and more monsters.

Well, Monster Hunter G is an exansion pack to Monster Hunter 1, much like MHF2G is to MHF2.

@ Kasz

Yes, my gf also emjoys LBP! Most girls will seat down and give it time just for the cute factor. The awesome platforming made us keep playing for over an hour.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.