DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Kasz216 said:
DMeisterJ said:
Soriku said:
@Kasz
Not to mention MH3 will be the best in the series anyway. I mean...since they're bascally the same I'd like to start out fresh instead of playing the older ones then playing MH3 then going "I've played this before..." and not enjoying it to my fullest since it seems kinda redone already.
|
Strong words coming from someone who hasn't played the first six itenerations.
>_>
|
He got that information directly from a self proported expert of the series.
(You actually.... You basically said all that in this thread other then MH3 will be better. Though as you stated it's basically going to be the same game but extra stuff.)
|
I really wouldn't call any of them the best.
Essentially, they're all the same.
If that's the case, then MH4 will be the best, then 5, and 6. >_>
|
Well yeah. The next is the best when everything is the same but extra content.
Unless the extra content both
A) Sucks
B) Is forced on you.
|
Which could be a problem for MH3.
It now has co-op local play, but it could easily suck, if you're both stuck in the same area (i.e.: If you are in Area 1, can your local partner be in a different area?).
And now they added water fights, and I hope to god it isn't forced on you, cause that's looking a little sketchy at the moment.
|
Who's forcing you to use co-op Local Play?
Though it has Co-op Local play?
That actually makes me a lot more interested in it. If the PS2 version had co-op local play i'd totally buy that. While i have a huge backlog of games... i don't have nearly enough Co-op games to play with the Girlfriend.
LBP doesn't have Co-op local does it?
As for the Water sections. Yeah I'd say that's a too close to call, though if they don't change much i don't see why it'd be forced on you that much. Since the same stuff should likely be made the same way.
If it follows most games like this path... that stuff will just be part of new stuff.
