It is funny how someone can even compare crysis and console games graphically. Crysis looks so much better. Second point what I want to say is that how many console games have same physics than crysis? In crysis you can literally blow up everything. In console games physics are shit.
PC's will always have the best graphics- because they constantly evolve. Developers can put different quality settings for the various rigs out there. Not so true for consoles. Its just one configuration and just one setting. SO this comparison is silly. PC's will always rule high end graphics, HD consoles will always give you great graphics at a cheap price.
Your comparing consoles that were developed over 3 yrs ago. 3yrs is a lifetime In the PC graphics industry. would crysis run at 45-60 FPS @ 1080p on an athlon x2 with 2 gigs RAM and geforce 6 or maybe 7..
I didnt think so.
@vlad
Hd consoles: 360 core price at launch $ 299 vs $250 for the wii.. for 50 bucks you got a lot more visual juice.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
owner of : atari 2600, commodore 64, NES,gameboy,atari lynx, genesis, saturn,neogeo,DC,PS2,GC,X360, Wii
5 THINGS I'd like to see before i knock out:
a. a AAA 3D sonic title
b. a nintendo developed game that has a "M rating"
c. redesgined PS controller
d. SEGA back in the console business
e. M$ out of the OS business
| konnichiwa said: I prefer this kind of grahpics:
|
Yes, these are the best.
Okami
To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made. I won't open my unworthy mouth.
Sri Lumpa said:
Would you be willing to do the same test for Wii/PS360 multiplat by neutering the PS360 to wii spec and then say "let's see who does best"? If not then why do you do it here? It would be better to work on a price basis: How cheap can you make a PC that plays at the same IQ and framerate as a console? And here consoles win thanks to the $200 xbox 360 arcade. Anyway, this thread is confirming two things for me: 1) PS360's are a poor man's gaming PC. Just like PS3 owners say people would buy PS3 if they could afford it, some are buying PS3 because they can't afford gaming PC's. 2) the graphical differences between current gen consoles and next gen consoles (PS4...) is not likely to be high enough to matter to anybody but an increasingly tiny minority of people who can actually see the differences. This is already the case between SD and HD this gen for a good part of the general populace but will be increasingly true for most of today's graphic whores too. #2 also means that Nintendo has a good chance of totally obliterating the competition next gen as its next consoles is likely to be 2-3 times more powerful than the Ps3/360 (thanks to moore's law) so they will be able to have a bigger share of the core gamers that will not be able to see a difference between Nintendo's next gen and MS&Sony's next gen (the same crowd that cannot see the difference between this gen and more than half a gen forward already on the PC) while likely to retain the vast majority of the new gamers thanks to the brand they are forging this generation. |
Because it's "been there, done that" ? it's called PlayStation 2 and still exists. And you don't have to strip a supercomputer to lower it PS360 level, just take any Core Duo processor of your taste and a not so powerful graphics card, let's say a little above of what the 360 has inside. You won't be able to run , not only Crysis, that would be a joke the way you'd have to play it, you wouldn't be able to run the same games available for those HD consoles like Gears of War, Devil May Cry 4, Prince of Persia, etc, not as well as PS360 can do it. It's a well-known fact.
| arsenicazure said: PC's will always have the best graphics- because they constantly evolve. Developers can put different quality settings for the various rigs out there. Not so true for consoles. Its just one configuration and just one setting. SO this comparison is silly. PC's will always rule high end graphics, HD consoles will always give you great graphics at a cheap price. Your comparing consoles that were developed over 3 yrs ago. 3yrs is a lifetime In the PC graphics industry. would crysis run at 45-60 FPS @ 1080p on an athlon x2 with 2 gigs RAM and geforce 6 or maybe 7.. I didnt think so. @vlad Hd consoles: 360 core price at launch $ 299 vs $250 for the wii.. for 50 bucks you got a lot more visual juice. |
Yeah and for you to get the 360 that was actually worth it it would cost a larger amount. Even MS is offering people a deals and ways to get more storage on their Arcades nowadays, meaning that a decently big sorage was necessary in the first place. My argument still stands, if anyone in this thread that has bitched about the cost of the PC and use that as their excuse as to why their HD console's graphics are worse than the PC, expect me to link this thread from now on. Any argument that goes against the Wii from the HD fanboys can go agaisnt them from the PC fanboys.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835
| arsenicazure said: These pics r taken on $1000+ systems. . |
Like my system?
| Magnific0 said: You won't be able to run , not only Crysis, that would be a joke the way you'd have to play it, you wouldn't be able to run the same games available for those HD consoles like Gears of War, Devil May Cry 4, Prince of Persia, etc, not as well as PS360 can do it. It's a well-known fact.
|
You should check your facts then... because DMC4 runs at over 70 frames per second with antialiasing and everything maxed out on a Radeon HD4670... an $80 bucks card...
On my rig, it runs at near 200 frames per second hehe...
^Whatever. And by the way, running Crysis on your "rig" must be a disgrace to the game, without a doubt.
fazz said:
Like my system?
You should check your facts then... because DMC4 runs at over 70 frames per second with antialiasing and everything maxed out on a Radeon HD4670... an $80 bucks card... On my rig, it runs at near 200 frames per second hehe... |
I think this guy's PS3 can Easily play crysis in full graphix! no kidding!
http://gravity.phy.umassd.edu/ps3.html
| skipo said: I think this guy's PS3 can Easily play crysis in full graphix! no kidding!
http://gravity.phy.umassd.edu/ps3.html
|
PS4 = 2 PS3s duct taped together CONFIRMED!
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
