By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - The Colonel has jumped ship....

A ps3 for a 360 arcade? bad deal colonel. now I have to delete you off my psn friends list...sobs...



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Around the Network
leo-j said:
When the ps3 drops to 299, and WKC, Killzone 2, and all those march titles come out, will you repurchase a ps3?

 

"Im not saying the 360 lineup is better, at all. Im saying the big PS3 games coming out hold no interest for me."

"I understand your point, but as i said earlier, im a poor student living on a student loan with no job. I could never have afforded both consoles."

 

I'd take that as a no. Besides he can't take in all the 360's goodness in just 4 months!!



 

@Seece

Thanks for answering my question



 

mM
leo-j said:
When the ps3 drops to 299, and WKC, Killzone 2, and all those march titles come out, will you repurchase a ps3?

Didnt he say he wasnt interested in those games?

 Anyways colonel , have fun with your 360 . You wont get bored anytime soon , the J man hasnt anyways.



N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!

GEars 2 left4dead mk vs dc gears 1 halo 3 bioshock gta 4 Rock band 2 and proly buy some MS points and some live



 

Around the Network
Strategyking92 said:
leo-j said:
Strategyking, he sold a 60gb ps3 with full BC, also all PS3's support BC with PS1 games, just not PS2 games.

 

AND I DON'T GIVE A FLYING CRAP. You aren't even supposed to be in this forum, all you do is be negative and snobby! And you have no xbox to complain about!

 

Also if I might add, it was his decision, not yours. So stop being the way you're being.

 

hey lego-jay, why are you re-visiting this thread?

 

Maybe you didn't already read the above quote?



And that's the only thing I need is *this*. I don't need this or this. Just this PS4... And this gaming PC. - The PS4 and the Gaming PC and that's all I need... And this Xbox 360. - The PS4, the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360, and that's all I need... And these PS3's. - The PS4, and these PS3's, and the Gaming PC, and the Xbox 360... And this Nintendo DS. - The PS4, this Xbox 360, and the Gaming PC, and the PS3's, and that's all *I* need. And that's *all* I need too. I don't need one other thing, not one... I need this. - The Gaming PC and PS4, and Xbox 360, and thePS3's . Well what are you looking at? What do you think I'm some kind of a jerk or something! - And this. That's all I need.

Obligatory dick measuring Gaming Laptop Specs: Sager NP8270-GTX: 17.3" FULL HD (1920X1080) LED Matte LC, nVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3, 750GB SATA II 3GB/s 7,200 RPM Hard Drive

I think the question of disloyalty does not apply to those who have chosen not to have, or to keep, a PS3 but should be applied to Sony. Sony in their arrogance took the loyal legions of PS2 fans for granted and instead of building a capable, fun and reasonably priced console, chose instead to build a console that cost such an absurd amount to build that they couldn’t even consider selling it except at a huge loss and still they were twice the price they should have been.

In fact they were apparently not as interested in building the next generation Playstation as in promoting a media format for which there was, and for that matter still is, little enthusiasm. They were trying to sell us a gaming console at a ridiculous price by claiming it was the cheapest (through heavy subsidy) blu-ray player. This at the time when there was only a handful of movies to play on it. Now two years later blu-ray movies are still one small rack at Blockbuster that you could easily overlook and predictably, blu-ray players are now under $200 just when having one could be considered worthwhile.

My new notebook computer came with a blu-ray drive and HDMI out and it wasn’t even considered a major selling point. I had the computer almost three weeks before I even realized I had it. And frankly I still don’t particularly care.
They covered up a total lack of real innovation by building an immensely powerful processor that drove the cost of game development far higher than any real improvement in performance over its cheaper mainline design competition.

The purpose of a game console is to give good performance in a simple to maintain and reasonably priced package. Building one that cost as much as a PC in a vain effort to be on the absolute bleeding edge is an exercise in futility because the modular PC design will always catch up and pass the consoles before they are even well into their long cycle.

So who exactly was the PS3 built for? Apparently for those loyal customers that just assumed that Sony would remain true to its gaming heritage and ascend to the throne that was its birthright. But many of these fans balked at the ridiculous price and opted for either the less expensive Xbox which produced an equivalent quality image. Or for the (then) even less expensive Wii which have used innovation instead of horsepower to produce a console that in terms of fun and playability was more in the spirit of the PS2 than the overblown PS3.

I’m like many who came into the current round assuming I would be buying the next Playstation until I realized what an over-engineered, overpriced, not that much fun to play, monstrosity Sony had produced.

So my question is, are those of us who have opted out of the Playstation family disloyal or was Sony disloyal to us by giving us what they wanted to build rather than what we wanted to buy.



Grampy said:
I think the question of disloyalty does not apply to those who have chosen not to have, or to keep, a PS3 but should be applied to Sony. Sony in their arrogance took the loyal legions of PS2 fans for granted and instead of building a capable, fun and reasonably priced console, chose instead to build a console that cost such an absurd amount to build that they couldn’t even consider selling it except at a huge loss and still they were twice the price they should have been.

In fact they were apparently not as interested in building the next generation Playstation as in promoting a media format for which there was, and for that matter still is, little enthusiasm. They were trying to sell us a gaming console at a ridiculous price by claiming it was the cheapest (through heavy subsidy) blu-ray player. This at the time when there was only a handful of movies to play on it. Now two years later blu-ray movies are still one small rack at Blockbuster that you could easily overlook and predictably, blu-ray players are now under $200 just when having one could be considered worthwhile.

My new notebook computer came with a blu-ray drive and HDMI out and it wasn’t even considered a major selling point. I had the computer almost three weeks before I even realized I had it. And frankly I still don’t particularly care.
They covered up a total lack of real innovation by building an immensely powerful processor that drove the cost of game development far higher than any real improvement in performance over its cheaper mainline design competition.

The purpose of a game console is to give good performance in a simple to maintain and reasonably priced package. Building one that cost as much as a PC in a vain effort to be on the absolute bleeding edge is an exercise in futility because the modular PC design will always catch up and pass the consoles before they are even well into their long cycle.

So who exactly was the PS3 built for? Apparently for those loyal customers that just assumed that Sony would remain true to its gaming heritage and ascend to the throne that was its birthright. But many of these fans balked at the ridiculous price and opted for either the less expensive Xbox which produced an equivalent quality image. Or for the (then) even less expensive Wii which have used innovation instead of horsepower to produce a console that in terms of fun and playability was more in the spirit of the PS2 than the overblown PS3.

I’m like many who came into the current round assuming I would be buying the next Playstation until I realized what an over-engineered, overpriced, not that much fun to play, monstrosity Sony had produced.

So my question is, are those of us who have opted out of the Playstation family disloyal or was Sony disloyal to us by giving us what they wanted to build rather than what we wanted to buy.

Yea sony was rediculously cocky when the ps3 came out. 4d graphics , get a 2nd job to get the system. But sony came back to reality real fast with the wii killing it in sales and the 360 which will increase its lead over the ps3 substancially by the end of the year. Sony is regretting how much they messed up with their system with it still selling at A LOSS this late in its lifespan with no sign of making a profit anytime soon.

The only good thing for sony is that now they know they cannot be cocky and sell a system at $600 and make rediculous claims about their system

 



N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!

seece said:
leo-j said:
When the ps3 drops to 299, and WKC, Killzone 2, and all those march titles come out, will you repurchase a ps3?

 

"Im not saying the 360 lineup is better, at all. Im saying the big PS3 games coming out hold no interest for me."

"I understand your point, but as i said earlier, im a poor student living on a student loan with no job. I could never have afforded both consoles."

 

I'd take that as a no. Besides he can't take in all the 360's goodness in just 4 months!!

I couldnt have put it better myself. Thank you Seece

 



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot

Hopefully!



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot