R2... there's simply more depth as far as the gameplay and the game itself are concerned.

R2 baby.

My opinion of R2 changed tonight. Even though it's pretty hard to kill, there's nothing like a 60-player game. I must've sniped 10 people in a row with the fareye just now lol. I really goofed on my previous assessment of this game

conclusion: R2>>>>COD:WaW

Resistance 2 no question, shooter of the year.

You already have Cod4 so I would go with R2.

Im going buy Resistance 2 instead of World at war just beacuse they head back to ww2 but i guess that just me.

Amen to that.

I'd say Resistance 2 without a doubt. It's a new game, not the predecessor with a different timeframe and a flamethrower.

It looks a hell of a lot better. (Traditional) WWII is dead, and Treyarch needs to realise that. Hopefully, we can expect more from CoD6, which IW are supposedly bringing back to Modern warfare.

Also, when in doubt, look to IGN:

R2: 9.5

CoD: WaW: 9.2

Resistance 2 for me,I'll prefer FPS with original and epic histories,along great gameplay.

CoD WaW is a good game,but lost itself among all the second world war games.

What would you say if I tell you IT IS the best World War II game? Will you negate all those past years playing Medal of Honor and stuff? =P

COD WAW, numbers speak themselves, it is killing R2 sales.
yes it is deserved it, with R2 overhyping, hopefully Killzone won't have fate like R2