Yes I believe in God.

The universe exists. Why? Stuff don't just appear from nuffin. Thus there has to be a creator behind it.

 People need to get something straight. Atheism isn't anything, trying to group atheists together is arbitrary and insane. Hitler believed the sky is blue, I guess blue skyists gave us Hitler. Stalin didn't believe in Unicorns, I guess the anti-unicornists gave us Stalin. You see how ridiculous that sounds? Atheists don't act on Atheism the way theists act on religion. The fact that I do not believe in god does not dictate how I live my life, any more than the fact that you don't believe in Santa dictates yours. Atheists have no tenants, no orginizations, no rules, nothing that binds them together, or guides them as a unit other than that they are humans. There is no central dogma or text of the atheist. So you can't blame anything a person does on them being atheistic and more than you can blame it on their being alien-agnostic.

If people that worship god can't agree on who god hates (it's always the other guy) then that says something about them because god supposedly gave them a divine text, dogma and is guiding them. If atheists disagree with each other, it has nothing to do with their atheism because there is no atheistic dogma.

As for this, ignorance doesn't equate wrong. Taking that approach turns god into what is called "God of the gaps". Any place science hasn't completely figured it out, that's where god acted. And then when science does figure it out, then god retreats to some other mystery and resides there as it's perpetrator. Abiogenesis is a young and fledgeling science that gets very little funding or attention. Give it time and god will retreat to some other unknown.

And this This is a huge logical gap that never ceases to amaze me. If something can't come from nothing, then God must have made it. But then you just chase the question of origin backwards one more incredibly improbable step. Where did god come from? Oh, he came from nothing, rather he always existed. So god can always exist and that's not illogical, no no no. But the universe always existing, that's absurd! Something had to make it!

How is that not absurd? I'm going to take it a step further. A omnipotent super intelligent being can't just come from nothing, that's absurd. A duck made god. Now it makes sense.

Seems like an illogical hypothisis from a scientific standard.

I mean... look at how scientists approach things.

They see something they don't understand and ask a question.

"Why"

Then they come up with a hypothisis for why... and keep with that hypothisis believing in it and expiermenting with it until they prove or disprove it.

It's not a matter of "Do pink faeries exist." or "Does god exist"

It's a question of "Why does everything exist."

God is simply the hypothisis to that answer. 

Just how something like Dark Energy was the hypothisis to why the universe is expanding, despite the fact there was no actual proof for such a thing.  Or Ether... which was a hypothsis for... I forget what it was a hypothisis for now... something with why light travels "slower" in some areas?

Until

A) Another hyptohisis is proven.

or

B) Your hypothisis is disproven.

It's just as likely as any other outcome scientifically.

That's basically called "Deism".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deism

Old Honest Abe Lincoln was a Deist.

Benjamin Franklin too i believe.

Deism only came about back in the day (several centuries ago) so that scientific and political leaders could say they don't believe in god without them commiting social suicide.

The church would have ridiculued ANY scientist back then if he didn't admit to god, and hoenstly, would Lincoln have been even considered if he outright said he didn't believe in god? Same thing with Franklin, most people would have thorown him in the "godless damned" pile and not listened to any reason.

help me out with this one

-Are you a spiritual being having a human experience or are you a human being having a spiritual experience?

I'm a human being without any spiritual aspect involved.

Really? 

Because from my research it looked like Deism was created because of the pointless struggles between different religions in an attempt to get them to all agree on the main points they had... basically the guy hated the church and wanted something better... i forget his name.  Some british lord.

Ah it's in the Wikipedia Edward Herbert Cherbury...

still looks similar to that after all the reforms and such.  So i'm going to say you have a bit of a misconception there.