By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Left 4 Dead gets a 9.5

Just finished playing the demo for this game and I can tell you it is definitely a lot of fun. Controls on the 360, are pretty standard, but I kept wanting to hit "B" to melee and "LT" to aim, a la gears, and well...that didn't work.

Still it was a blast and I was playing with a friend who was a total noob (not much help) and two AI teammates, and still had a pretty decent time. Looking forward to playing this with more friends on-line.



Around the Network
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Excellent, L4D is another great shooter for gamers this holiday.

 

 

I May be mistaken zen, but i saw a topic you made not to long ago stating "Reviews by Offical gaming websites dont matter" or something like that... so... lol wut?

 

I also made this thread:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=47859

Here's what we got:

A lot of PS3 fans trying to discredit me, by tracking my posts, and hoping I don't write "IMO" or "reviews don't matter, fyi" in every post. Everytime I come up with the same answer, so listen up:

If I say a game is great in a thread that also has a numerical score in it, I'm might not be referring to the number. In fact, I'm usually referring to the written review(words and opinions of people I trust, not numbers). In this case I wasn't, allow me to explain:

 

Let me get one thing straight. I think that I know more about most games, and I also think that I have better taste than about 99.999% of people on this forum.

I didn't need to watch that review, to know Valve games are great.

I do, however, need you to watch the review, so you can work it out in your mind, for yourself.

I can't tell you how everything is, your mind won't allow it. You have free will, stubborn-ness, and angst. You're a human.

Therefore, I must guide you to the truth, without you realizing it.

By saying the game is great, I'm making a mental suggestion. Backing it up with a numerical review(which I didn't actually do in this case), doesn't mean I care about the review, it means that most people do.

I told you all that this game was great, months, weeks, days, and hours ago. I was right, I knew I was, and everyone else should have known it as well. This doesn't prove I'm right. My opinion can't be right. However, it's right. Paradox.

I'm simply repeating that opinion:

L4D is another great shooter for gamers this holiday. Duh.

Who needs a review to tell them that? I certainly don't. Apparently the vast majority of people here do though, but I digress.

Just becuase you don't understand WHY I know something, doesn't mean that you shouldn't accept that I do actually know it. I ponder how many times such things must happen before I'm finally trusted, then I realize that most people hope I'm wrong. No matter how thin the chances are that I am. I'm usually not. Bet that I am, is a suckers bet.

 

If people didn't misunderstand me, I wouldn't be brilliant.


Woah, You claim to have better taste than 99.99% of people on this forum, And that your nearly always right, Pretentious Much?

Most of you post is waffle zen, nothing to do with the topic. "Mental suggestion" WTF. You aint fooling me



blazinhead89 said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Excellent, L4D is another great shooter for gamers this holiday.

 

 

I May be mistaken zen, but i saw a topic you made not to long ago stating "Reviews by Offical gaming websites dont matter" or something like that... so... lol wut?

 

I also made this thread:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=47859

Here's what we got:

A lot of PS3 fans trying to discredit me, by tracking my posts, and hoping I don't write "IMO" or "reviews don't matter, fyi" in every post. Everytime I come up with the same answer, so listen up:

If I say a game is great in a thread that also has a numerical score in it, I'm might not be referring to the number. In fact, I'm usually referring to the written review(words and opinions of people I trust, not numbers). In this case I wasn't, allow me to explain:

 

Let me get one thing straight. I think that I know more about most games, and I also think that I have better taste than about 99.999% of people on this forum.

I didn't need to watch that review, to know Valve games are great.

I do, however, need you to watch the review, so you can work it out in your mind, for yourself.

I can't tell you how everything is, your mind won't allow it. You have free will, stubborn-ness, and angst. You're a human.

Therefore, I must guide you to the truth, without you realizing it.

By saying the game is great, I'm making a mental suggestion. Backing it up with a numerical review(which I didn't actually do in this case), doesn't mean I care about the review, it means that most people do.

I told you all that this game was great, months, weeks, days, and hours ago. I was right, I knew I was, and everyone else should have known it as well. This doesn't prove I'm right. My opinion can't be right. However, it's right. Paradox.

I'm simply repeating that opinion:

L4D is another great shooter for gamers this holiday. Duh.

Who needs a review to tell them that? I certainly don't. Apparently the vast majority of people here do though, but I digress.

Just becuase you don't understand WHY I know something, doesn't mean that you shouldn't accept that I do actually know it. I ponder how many times such things must happen before I'm finally trusted, then I realize that most people hope I'm wrong. No matter how thin the chances are that I am. I'm usually not. Bet that I am, is a suckers bet.

 

If people didn't misunderstand me, I wouldn't be brilliant.


 

Woah, You claim to have better taste than 99.99% of people on this forum, And that your nearly always right, Pretentious Much?

 

 

He did admit his pride in his last post, in the black crossout click on it, hold it, and you should know the rest.

If he didn't admit it then its free game but see'n as the guy did well heh, it doesnt make it right but honesty is a must in the long run.

 



Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:

Thats pretty deep there buddy, a lil pride in that text but whatever.

Alright then if thats the way you roll, did ya think R2 was 9.5 material at the very least? cause i'll admit i sure as hell didn't.

 

 

I haven't completed it yet. I don't go online with my shooters, and I dislike multiplayer, so right now...no, I wouldn't give it a 9.5. Beyond that, I can't comment. The sense of scale in the game is really great though.

I think it we give Insomniac one more try, they'll come back with something really special, though. They'll use a lot of the stuff they see from forums and in the reviews, to improve their single player experience. They are a really great company when it comes to adapting.

...and being an arrogant prick is part of my charm.

 

 

Mmhmm, fair enough.

Well i get your point. turns out i just misjudged you, which now an days i rarely do when it comes to gaming sites and so forth.

Apoligies buddy, by the way is R2 worth it's 60 dollar price tag, or no?

You seem to have a solid opinion on things so...

Hes one of the most Non biased,Not caught up in the Hype person on this site,One of the few good people on this site..

 

 



Around the Network
Garnett said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
 

Thats pretty deep there buddy, a lil pride in that text but whatever.

Alright then if thats the way you roll, did ya think R2 was 9.5 material at the very least? cause i'll admit i sure as hell didn't.

 

 

I haven't completed it yet. I don't go online with my shooters, and I dislike multiplayer, so right now...no, I wouldn't give it a 9.5. Beyond that, I can't comment. The sense of scale in the game is really great though.

I think it we give Insomniac one more try, they'll come back with something really special, though. They'll use a lot of the stuff they see from forums and in the reviews, to improve their single player experience. They are a really great company when it comes to adapting.

...and being an arrogant prick is part of my charm.

 

 

Mmhmm, fair enough.

Well i get your point. turns out i just misjudged you, which now an days i rarely do when it comes to gaming sites and so forth.

Apoligies buddy, by the way is R2 worth it's 60 dollar price tag, or no?

You seem to have a solid opinion on things so...

Hes one of the most Non biased,Not caught up in the Hype person on this site,One of the few good people on this site..

 

 

 

 

I'll take your word for it, by the way...about your sig...what...the...? O_o



Wait you were waiting for someone else to decide for you this game was going to look good?

DID YOU EVEN SEE THE TRAILERS? OH COURSE IT WAS GOING TO BE GOOD!



Dinomax said:
Wait you were waiting for someone else to decide for you this game was going to look good?

DID YOU EVEN SEE THE TRAILERS? OH COURSE IT WAS GOING TO BE GOOD!

 

lol, you better cut it out dino, people are gonna start thinking you're a Zenalt.

Nice post.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

I didn't expect less



||Tag courtesy of fkusumot - "Heaven is like a Nintendo theme park!"||Join the Medal of Honor: Heroes 2 American League HERE!||

That's a great score,I'm not sure if I should get it for PC or 360.



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"