Retards from metacritic think A from 1UP is 100 for GeOW2, then what is A+ for LBP? Gamerankings is much better site with credibility. I would rather judge the game with IGN, GS, GT, Eurogamer, 1UP and Edge reviews. These 6 sites are the most popular and much better credibility then no-body Variety.

Not sure if this was mentioned yet, but I was browsing around Metacritic and wanted to check if Dead Space was still a 90 rated game, unfortunately it is not. Awesome game.

Anyways, the game is rated an 89 overall for 360 and an 88 overall for PS3, not a big difference I know (Wasn't the PS3 the lead platform for this game?)but I spotted something.

Variety rated the game a 70 (according to Metacritic). Why did they add this 70 into the PS3 scores and not the 360 version? What omit it for one and use it on another, causing its overall score to drop below the other?

This is Metacritic inconsistencies I am always talking about. This is the "pick and choose" approach I speak of.

 LBP I guess is supposed to tip the scale?

It is not just GeOW 2 though, this happens with any game rated an A. Metacritic are just to incompetant to figure out how to distinguish the difference between an A and an A+.

Real hard stuff you know.

 Which is why the XBOX 360 uses MSN

which is why sony pictures are available on bluray

Lets just ban review scores and have done with it!

lol, yeah, a group of PS3 fans group together and ban bad review scores for PS3 exclusives. That's credible.