Oh... I thought you meant this website...

which if anything 360 fanboyism is greatly underrepresented. Wii Fanboys seem to have to fill in some times.

They gave Fable II a 98

and Fallout 3 a 97

Both games much better then LBP?

Confirmed!

here's a lower score if that makes you happy http://www.ps3informer.com/playstation-3/games/review-is-lbp-a-littlebitboring-009450.php

I believe they are both 95s like IGN said. Reviews are important because good review scores lead to hype for the consoles that they are on, and bad review scores for games lead to lower sales. IGN seems to be one of the least biased review sites out there while quite a few of the other sites are still very heavily pro-360 biased. I think its because the 360 is an American console and these publications are trying to put forth the idea that American games are the best. Also it seems easier for some reviewers to be able to overemphasize the importance of some rather sophomoric games while feeling compelled to rate games that require a more discriminating palate to enjoy a little lower than they should be rated.

Thats how i felt about the Beta, It just wasn't my cup of tea, to much to do for a spiff of results.

The article also says: " If you consider yourself a "casual gamer" who enjoys customizing avatars, side-scrolling puzzler-adventures similar to Super Mario Bros, and have time to devote hours to designing levels, then LBP is for you"

Kind of defeats the whole casual aspect of a casual gamer.

From the title I thought you meant Vgchartz is a 360 fanboy site, LOL, cause that couldnt be more wrong. That would have made for a funnier thread, but this is cool too.

lol,,,you know what is more funny  with that site(variety)?they sumbit the high score multiplats only for 360 in metacritics.and low score ones only for PS3(DEAD SPace).

if you observe  the sites behaviour carefully ,you can get to a conslusion very fast

Have you played them both?  Or do you just WANT them to be 95?  Because R2 has only 3 of 17 scores of 95+, if I am not mistaken, with G4 giving it 100 (and they give out way too many of those - even according to Sessler).  The rest of the scores are good, but 95?  i mean, MGS4 is a metacritic 94.  Is R2 better than MGS4?  I doubt it.  COD4 is a 94.  Is R2 a better shooter than COD4?  I doubt that too.

I'm not sure why people get worked up by a 89 average score.  That would be a top 10 game on the system.

Well, I would like for it to be a 95. That doesn't mean that IGN isn't right about it.

Variety is the spice of life/reviews?