By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Both Exclusive Games List for 2009!(360 & PS3)

Garnett on 04 November 2008
ElectroRocker said:
Would it make the 360 list that much bigger if i would
add Alan wake, velvet assasin and splinter cell:conviction for 360
and the agency and DC Universe
One game is not a big deal.

 

And  age of conan,arcania:A gothic tale,Champions online,Cry on,Divinity 2 and prey 2 are just some to name that you didnt both listing and good god people FF13 is not a PS3 exclusive as its coming out on 360 EVERYWHERE!



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

Around the Network
SpartanFX on 04 November 2008

^^not in japan,,,and in 09 the game will be released in japan



 

 

 

Stats87 on 04 November 2008
321tttrini4everz said:
- Final Fantasy XIII Versus (JPRG) = shouldn't be on the list though

it is debatable, while a 2010 chance is a possibility so is a Winter 2009. But then again you can break it down by other SE release as they said they like to space them.

If FFXIII hits Japan Summer 09, Versus has a better chance of an 09 release. In the former doesn't hit till the Fall, then Spring 2010 would be a good bet for Versus.

Personally if I had to guess

Winter 2008: FF:Dissdia

February- KH:358/2/ Star Ocean:TLH

Spring 09 - DQIX

Fall 09 - FFXIII/ KH: BBS

Winter 09 - KH: Birth By Sleep/FFXIII

Spring 10 - Agito XIII

Summer 10 - Versus XIII (maybe Fall)

Fall 2015: Kingdom Hearts 3



Onyxmeth on 04 November 2008
ElectroRocker said:
Would it make the 360 list that much bigger if i would
add Alan wake, velvet assasin and splinter cell:conviction for 360
and the agency and DC Universe
One game is not a big deal.

Let me help explain a bit. Those two have a point, but they seem to lack the ability to portray it, so they sum it up to "PC isn't competition". That's why they are acting like babies about it. Here's my take. Your list is correct, but I feel you're going about it the wrong way of approaching a comparison in the first place. If we are talking about a comparison across all platforms then exclusives may be more important to consider. In a vacuum like you have made, where we are only comparing the PS3 to the Xbox 360, the only games that should matter are the games that are on the one console and not the other.

Case in point. Based on your current criteria, I can make the Wii look phenomanally better than the PS3? Why? Because it has almost nothing but exclusives and the PS3 has to share over 90% of it's releases with the 360 and PC. However, by doing so it discounts what makes the PS3 more attractive than a Wii(based on a hypothetical person's opinion of course), with games like Bioshock 2, Resident Evil 5, etc. that will not show up on the Wii. Those games should count if the only comparison is a Wii and a PS3. You have chosen to use a comparison where the only two consoles are the 360 and PS3, so because of that, you should highlight what makes each different, not what makes each different with the addition of a third party that is not being considered for comparison in this case.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



321tttrini4everz on 04 November 2008

ff13 should not be on the list



Around the Network
ElectroRocker on 04 November 2008

If u want
i can make a semi-exclusive list too
and a Exclusive DLC List to satisfie you 360 owners ;)



JaggedSac on 04 November 2008
Onyxmeth said:

Let me help explain a bit. Those two have a point, but they seem to lack the ability to portray it, so they sum it up to "PC isn't competition". That's why they are acting like babies about it. Here's my take. Your list is correct, but I feel you're going about it the wrong way of approaching a comparison in the first place. If we are talking about a comparison across all platforms then exclusives may be more important to consider. In a vacuum like you have made, where we are only comparing the PS3 to the Xbox 360, the only games that should matter are the games that are on the one console and not the other.

Case in point. Based on your current criteria, I can make the Wii look phenomanally better than the PS3? Why? Because it has almost nothing but exclusives and the PS3 has to share over 90% of it's releases with the 360 and PC. However, by doing so it discounts what makes the PS3 more attractive than a Wii(based on a hypothetical person's opinion of course), with games like Bioshock 2, Resident Evil 5, etc. that will not show up on the Wii. Those games should count if the only comparison is a Wii and a PS3. You have chosen to use a comparison where the only two consoles are the 360 and PS3, so because of that, you should highlight what makes each different, not what makes each different with the addition of a third party that is not being considered for comparison in this case.

 

 

Best post so far.



Legend11 on 04 November 2008
ElectroRocker said:
Would it make the 360 list that much bigger if i would
add Alan wake, velvet assasin and splinter cell:conviction for 360
and the agency and DC Universe
One game is not a big deal.

 

Actually there would be a lot more games, you would be shocked.  But I don't want to rock the boat so feel free to continue with your artificial list to indicate which system's library is the best.  To me it's like pitting two players against each other in a game to see which is the best but then stating certain moves are off-limits because one player is better at them.



ElectroRocker on 04 November 2008

Yea i would say the same if my Console of choice only had so called "exclusive" games that are coming out on another plattform aswell.



JaggedSac on 04 November 2008
ElectroRocker said:
Yea i would say the same if my Console of choice only had so called "exclusive" games that are coming out on another plattform aswell.

 

I know it sucks doesn't it.  360 owners are sad losers.