Garnett on 03 November 2008
| Kantor said: I would have to say COD4. It's a good game, but: -The single player campaign is extremely short and is nothing thats next gen like. -There is no multiplayer (co-op) campaign. -The graphics are nothing special just added COD2 graphics. MGS4 and Uncharted prove just what the PS3 is capable of and COD4 is nowhere near this. I know it's multiplat, but I've seen better looking 360 games as well. (I remember reading a Gamespot user review where a guy said that MGS4's graphics were disappointing after COD4. Don't you hate it when people review a game without so much as looking at it? He gave it a 7/10) - No trophies (lol) The only thing that was good about it was the online multiplayer, which I will admit was decent; being able to shoot thru walls and redirect bullets based off of what the objects made of is ingenious.But why spend so much time on online multiplayer and neglect single player, even leaving out an increasingly common co-op campaign, just to make the multiplayer good? I guess they didn't have enough time for everything, and so decided to work on one feature. Why all of these perfect scores and Game of The Year awards? Why does it have the same metascore as Gears of War and MGS4, both of which are far superior? I would give it 8.0/10. |
Added!
