If you're going to keep this up, then at least PM me and we'll do it there. I don't want the thread derailed any more than it already has.

Well then if it's possible.... Why isn't it done.

I say. port it. Let MS cover the expense. And lets see just how crappy it will be.

oh a good old debate.... first since when 3rd party exclusives on PS were on PS first ??? most have been stolen from nintendo and sega...or other platforms... 2nd about the multiple disc issue... i don't see the problem in the first place to change a CD especially with all the cut scenes... now people saying BR is da shit and having multiple DVDs is lame... you want my opinion having any form of CDs is lame in the 21 first century... that's why i still don't believe in the HD br... in 3 years VOD will had catch up in 5 it will be the standard... mark my words....
now since when PS3 has been defined as more powerfull for GAMING than XB... show me a correlation of several benchmarks that cleary shows it ???? yeah more horse power in the PS# in no way a proof it's better for gaming though..... it's like saying my HiFi system is more powerfull than yours so it's better for home theatre 5.1 that's not true... I can have a less powerfull sys more adapted to 5.1 and have a better rendering of the sound in a movie than a more powerful HiFi sys....

sorry if all that has been said already I just read the first page....

and I'm not taking down sony... but those 3 arguments are probably the worst one to use here.....

Its not stealing games if its not a sony built game what right does Sony have to MGS4 just like what right does MS have to Bioshock?  I never understood why a good game should not go multiplat I am glad bioshock which I played and beat on the 360 is going over to the PS3 more people should enjoy a good game

Well, I see this conversation has gone nowhere. God save us from the inaudible compressed audio that will inevitably result from the only tentpole PS3 title going multiplat.

If this happens....God save us all. Microsoft is in the red-zone with a megaton.

If you say absolute stuff like this, it could easily come back on you, you know.

lol, finally solid proof that I've forgotten more shit than most people on this site will ever know.

PS: The point still stands, as it was related to some JA saying that no respectible action game could be on 2 discs, and indeed MGS1 is on 2 discs, so pwnd.

Who honestly expected to hear Microsoft say the console couldn't accommodate the game? I don't care one way or the other. It's not like they don't practically share most 3rd party titles as is. People need to stop buying consoles over 3rd party exclusives cause they will become rarer and rarer on the HD consoles anyways. By the end of the generation I wouldn't be surprised to see only about 5 to 10 3rd party exclusives per HD console(not counting live and psn games of course).

That means nothing. Microsoft doesn't have to say anything like that. They could just say nothing. It wasn't a yes or no question, it was a statement about MGS4, which indicates to me that it's at least being looked into by one company or the other.

You don't see a lot of comments about Gears of War from Sony do you?

If Cliffy came out tomorrow and said he was investigating a Gears of War port for the PS3, wouldn't that be damn near confirmation.

The only reason it's dissimilar is because of this Sony fan talking point that the game is only possible on the PS3(which they also said about FFXIII, and which is obviously a garbage talking point that would be disproved once and for all with a MGS4 port). MGS4 looks good, plays good. If the PS3 can handle it, then it can be ported to the 360, and vice-versa. Downgrades? Maybe, but not necessarily. Extra and/or changed content? Certainly. Confirmed? Not yet, but will be megaton if happens, with tons of Sony fanboys who now say it is impossible changing their talking point to "It'll be downgraded, and who didn't see this coming anyway?"

Do you see how I did that? They pay people for analysis worse than that.