Brothers in Arms has only just been released.

Super! Ubisoft just made TGS obselete.

As opposed to, what, caring about your interests? All of them are only looking to make the most money possible. If you believe otherwise, you've been fooled.

As an obvious example considering your avatar, SquareEnix does not make less money than Ubisoft because they genuinely care about your interests, and are willing to make less money than Ubisoft if it makes you happy; they make less money because they haven't been as savvy with their money in recent years.

I should have added making the most money while spending the least. That's what I meant.

That makes more sense! Normally, I am a proponent of cost considerations. My favorite game this generation is Wii Sports, after all, and my two favorite games of all time are Chess and Go, which cost around .02 dollars to reproduce on an Atari 2600.

But that does not mean I endorse all cheaply made games. Among those I do not endorse are these made by Ubisoft. So jeers to Ubisoft. Jeers, I say!

HOW DARE THEY MAKE MONEY!!!11

these people give the french a bad name.
luckily im english and we have companies giving good games. eg headstrong who made batallion wars. and are now amking house of the dead

You guys need to be like me and forget Ubisoft exists, I honestly forgot what Ubisoft was until I read the OP, then I remembered Prince of Persia, I'm hoping after this message I'll forget they exist again.

Closing Comments
Wii-makes walk a thin line already, but when a game can't iron out even the most blatant bugs (three second freezes occurring constantly in general play?), it's obvious that it's more about making a few quick stacks of cash than putting any real effort into a package. It's a shame too, as so many of the concepts in the game sound great on paper, including Wii IR for squad management, and the ability therein to manipulate your squad, select suppressive fire, and conduct an AI unit in the same way a skilled player can tear it up in Pro Evolution Soccer, but it just doesn’t work. It falls short due to the PS2's source material, a lack of any sort of quality assurance during the port-over, and an obvious quick cash-in. We've gathered two main points from checking out Double Time on Wii. First off, Brothers in Arms -- if done right -- could be amazing on Nintendo's system. Secondly, when Ubisoft talked about Nintendo-like quality on Wii, it obviously wasn't in reference to this one.

Rating	Description
out of 10	click here for ratings guide
3.5	Presentation The games are virtually unchanged from their PS2 versions. The general presentation at that time was impressive, but after years of progression, it isn't much to see now. Frame issues hurt the port.
3.0	Graphics Both titles looks pretty muddy in their port from PS2 to Wii, but more than anything else it's the sketchy frame-rate and constant freezes that kill it. Double Time is a mess.
7.0	Sound There's some decent VO, and the in-game audio isn't bad. Unchanged from PS2, but not bad in its own right.
3.0	Gameplay The pointer controls are a mess, the frame issues kill the fluidity, and the AI is at times barely passable, while at others broken and moronic. Painful.
1.0	Lasting Appeal It's two games for the price of one, but even Ubisoft's own Far Cry (also an overall mess) is already a much stronger offering. Multiplayer was removed, and the game is broken in countless areas.
3.0 Bad	OVERALL (out of 10 / not an average)

Thanks a lot. That was a really good read. DS sales passed from 16% to 37% of their Q1 sales. Ubisoft is one of the most profitable gaming company on top of that. It seems that DS is the best platform to support right now.