Let's ignore all the technical stuff, most of us think that those games look incredible. When you say that Uncharted only looks good because of the artistic design, have you seen the water!!!! It is the most beautiful thing in a video game, I will get some more pics of the jet-ski sections which look amazing.

What do you mean by WipEout does not really have the budget, it runs at a constant 60FPS with loads of stuff on screen and 1080p for most of the time (though that resolution does vary a little in places)

If a game can be made to look incredible on the PS3 (uncharted) then surely it is lazy devs faults that they cannot get good graphics from the PS3.

@soriku

MGS4 looks better than SO4

Look at the water here... lovely....

@ soriku, it does look incredible and come very close, but I just think that Uncharted has the edge with its water (if you just walk in only the bottom of his jeans get wet!!!!!)

Anyway, SO4 is coming out about 1 1/2 years after Uncharted, so it does have a small advantage. We'll have a better comparison when Uncharted 2 is revealed

@ bingo, could you shrink some of your photos so it does not muck up the reply screen?

 http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/gearsofwar/images/e/e0/Skorge_Crouch.jpg

We have Gears of War 2 for that, even though imo yes it is. But im partial for Star ocean anything. Munkeh Bioshock's water looks better, and gears 2 is nothing to scoff at either.

so your expecting some one to beat your opinion with their opinion, nice. These arguments are pointless as graphics even from a technical aspect are too subjective,
unless you can somehow empirically quantify graphics from a technical basis, which you can't, it is impossible to say ps3 hands down beats the 360 or vice versa,
personally I think Gears is still the second best looking game this gen from a technical point of view, only behind gears 2,
but I don't think it blows away any of the competent ps3 exclusives or anything (you'll never hear me say any competent h.d. game looks bad from a technical stand point)
so unless you gain the ability to some how categorize and quantify graphics technically , while at the same time correcting for variables, like a.i., scope, physics and so forth it can't be done
and then artistically it is a whole other can of worms

I'm curious. Setting aside for a moment the fact that we don't do ban bets here any longer, how exactly were you supposed to lose this? No matter what picture anyone puts up, it's never going to change your mind and there's no way to look at these games and say A has better graphics than B conclusively. You could have put up SNES games and asked for PC games in comparison and there's still no way for anyone to prove one is better than the next. My personal opinion is there isn't one game on your list with a tenth of the artistic beauty of Oboro, Braid or Castle Crashers. The former is a Wii game and the latter two are downloadable games over Xbox Live, and yes I feel they trump anything currently available on the PS3. However I can't prove I'm right and you can't prove I'm wrong.

Therefore, I'll be closing this thread in 10 minutes. Everyone may utilize this thread for friendly conversation until then.

EDIT: BTW, here's my "proof".

i remember he said something about a list of exclusives, you can't just provide one game and call it even. He provided at least 15 of the top games in terms of graphics, 3 of them i wouldn't call that graphicallly superior to anything else but honestly,....
This man wants some input

lots of eye candies here to c! :D keep posting pics and argue guys its so pleasurable to c so many screenshots of beautiful games (regardless of ps3 or 360) in just one thread. keep it going!

Damn, those Alan Wake screenshots look incredible. Is it coming out on PC?

I still don't see what's so amazing about SO4? It looks very good, don't get me wrong...but the game severely lacks character detail. None of the characters have any facial detail whatsoever..just adding cool costumes and good backgrounds doesn't make the graphics good.