so it isnt true?

^This

who knows. Looks like we'll have to wait for further clarification.

if this turns out to be true, it is actually a bad thing.

If you think about it, Nintendo already have a hard enough time shaking off the stereotype that there is no core 3rd party support for the Wii. Conduit (along with Madworld) is on the top of nearly all core Wii owners buy lists, it was a beacon of hope for Wii gamers that the tide was turning 3rd party wise.

Anyway, my guess is still Ubisoft to publish.

May have just been a slip.

She said "First-party" shooter.

Did she mean person? Or party?

We've already come to the conclusion that she's a little off her rocker, but that could go many ways.

Maybe she thinks that exclusive means first party? Or maybe she really meant first-party? Or maybe she meant to say first-person? Or maybe a slip of the tongue.

Who knows.

As okey said:

I'm pretty sure she meant First-Person...because A) That's the strangest way to let slip that they're publishing The Conduit, and B) it'd be a second party title.

Oh no. Got my hopes up for nothing. Anyway still hoping it's either nintendo or EA

What a ride! So what is it? I'm dying to know. Personally, I don't want Nintendo to publish the game. I think it'll sell the same regardless.

What the hell happened? The Conduit got REALLY good.

Yay! At least the sales may be better. Nintendo better advertise it well.