Showertea said:
Actually, the strong suit of the PS3 is graphics, so you'll have to include the price of a HD TV, so let's add 1000$ to the PS3 price. Only say 10% of the population has a HD TV already, so the average consumer has to pay 900$ more for the 'strong suit' of the Wii.
(Wii fans can do arbitrary and ridiculous math too)
|
Just wanted to quote this for those who may have missed it the first time around.
@DGM,
Its easy to falsely define the premise of a situation and come to any conclusion you want. Of course in this case your premise is false for more than one reason.
First and foremost its false because you are comparing a fully loaded Wii Setup to a bare-bones PS3 setup under the guise of "what it does best". Not only are people not fooled by this but folks like Showertea and Blacksaber have called you on it (which you promptly ignored thanks to what is known as "antiprocess").
Of course, in reality your argument applies to the PS3 just as well as the Wii. If you want to play MGS4 or Uncharted the way it was meant to be played (and the way I played them I might add) then you need an HDTV capable of at least 720p and a 5.1 surround sound system (especially for MGS4). I say especially MGS4 because having played it on my well calibrated HDTV & Surround Sound system and then played it on an SDTV with stereo sound I can tell you its an entirely different (relatively disappointing) experience. But neither of these are requirements, you can play the systems without these things. But should you want this kind of comparison then you have to be fair about it (which you appear to have no intentions of doing)
Second, your premise is false because you set forth as part of your premise that it's primary purpose as a console is for party games. You imply there are no good single player experiences on the Wii and therefore people MUST have these extra wii-motes to take part in its only good experience.
Well sorry to disappoint but Metroid Prime 3: Corruption, No More Heroes, Super Mario Galaxy, Fire Emblem, Super Paper Mario, Resident Evil 4, de Blob, Okami, Boom Blox, Medal of Honor, Zelda: Twighlight Princess, Trauma Center (new Blood and Second Opinion), Red Steel, SC: Double Agent, MS: Anthology, Downhill Jam, Godfather: The Blackhand Edition, Prince of Persia: Rival Swords, Scarface: The World is Yours, Zack & Wiki: QFBT, Manhunt 2, Dewy's Adventure, Bully: Scholarship Edition, PES 2008, Blast Works, Brothers in Arms: Double Time (Earned in Blood & Road to Hill 30)etc...etc...are all games that have single player value and are available right now! Clearly Wii owners can easily get by with a single Wii-Mote and Nunchuk without any problems at all.
Of course there is also Mushroom Men, Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World, Arc Rise Fantasia, Star Wars: Clone Wars, Deadly Creatures, Disaster Day of Crisis, Final Fantasy Chrystal Chronicles: The Chrystal Bearers, Sonic Unleashed, Kid Icarus, The Conduit, Ghostbusters, Quantum of Solace, King's Story, World of Goo, Tenchu 4, Overlord: Dark Legend, etc...etc...are all games that have major single player components and are in development. I suppose I could technically add a Mario, Zelda, and Pikmin 3 to that list as well =P
And sadly these are only the ones off the top of my head (most of them I own or will own).
Third, your premise is false because you are not required to have 4 Wii-Motes and 4 Nunchuks to play even most party games. You can easily get by on 2 or in some cases even 1, because you can take turns using the same Wii-mote on plenty of those party games.
Fourth, your premise is intellectually dishonest because you're assuming the maximum price for the WMP peripheral. The most likely price range has been put at $10 to $20, so an honest evaluation would account for this at $15 as a compromise on the two extremes, where as a biased evaluation maximizes the value to attempt to maximize the point.
Fifth, your premise is misleading because you don't have to spend $40 on Wii-Motes and $20 on Nunchuks. You can actually get a Wii-Mote and Nunchuk (brand new) for $40 on a number of sites from ebay, amazon, etc..And you can spend even less if you purchase used (which many many people do).
Sixth, your premise is wrong on batteries as well. For $25 you can get Li-Ion batteries for 4 Wii-Motes along with the charger stand. It also has the added benefit of automatically recharging the Wii-Motes after every use and never having to worry about swapping in the middle of play.
In conclusion the entire point you are making "the costs of the 2 systems is much closer then most people realize" is based on warped facts and tortured logic. Or to put it simply, it is a non sequitur.
To summarize:
- A fully loaded Wii setup is not a fair comparison to a bare-bones PS3 setup.
- The Wii offers far more than a party experience, there are plenty of single player games as well. Not to mention online multiplayer games which I didn't even list.
- Even if you do focus on the party game experiences, you don't need 4 wii-motes
- You assume the absolute maximum reasonable price to inflate your point. While this is only a minor change in the price it illustrates the way you approach the issue.
- Your position ignores alternate purchase methods that many Wii owners take advantage of.
- You attempt to overestimate the battery cost by accounting for a doubly expensive and less effective battery setup.