I know what I posted. To make it easier for you here it is again:

Now please answer my bolded question.  I'm really curious to know if you can read my mind or were just making a smart-arse remark.

Why make it easier for me? I would have asked you to post it if I didn't get it. I was asking you to remeber yourself.

But you actually don't realize what you wrote there just might have given me an indication of how hurt you think they are?

If I tell 10 people in Russia something negative about you, have I harmed your image with them? 

In doing so, have I actually hurt you?  Does it hurt you if 10 people in Russia hold a low opinion of you?

It's a subtle difference you might not understand but keep trying.

For more thought though, if those 10 people each tell 10 more people who then each tell 10 more people... what happens later on down the road?

Try that's not a good anlogy, as it's not properly related to what you wrote. A company's reputation to their supposed base is not the same as an unknown person being talked about in another country. So the difference is not subtle. It's too big for what you are tying to state to fit.

And down the road assumes nothing will come along to change that.

Ubisoft is working on Wii games, and they have said so. They're adjusting their HD engines to fit on the Wii. Would they do something like that for shovelware, when it would cost a hell of a lot less time and money just to port engines from the 6th gen? That wasn't to you, but to all of those who assume Ubisoft is just going to continue snubbing the Wii.

Monster Hunter Tri


oh... wait.

What is the company's supposed base though?  Ubisoft's Petz games are clearly not targetted at you or I (me at least) so we're not even a concern in that demographic.  We're very much akin to those people in Russia when it comes to marketing those kinds of games.

So then do you foresee a lot of good Ubisoft support coming?  In looking at their past developer history, I don't see much.  Their publishing history looks good but that's publishing.

Personally, I would like to see them focus on developing new titles for the Wii and delivering multiplatform titles in the same basic time period as they appear on other consoles.

Plus, since I doubt we will see Vulgus, so how about Breath of Fire.

Mike from Morgantown

Resident Evil 5

It should be on the Wii in the first place.

Why do people keep spreading this nonesense?  Outside of the portable versions, MH has rather weak sales.  The best selling version on consoles sold less than the weakest portable version.  All of those millions of sales?  Only on handhelds.  If they can't bust a million putting the game on the PS2, putting it on the Wii isn't going to change anything.

On top of that, most people don't even know who Tatsunoko are, and wouldn't even consider that game.  It won't get near a million.

What will break a million?  Those three games smoked hostage wants on the wii.  They will all sell more than a million while the two wii games you speak of will both failt to.

So you think that Wii fans bragging about MH3 being exclusive on the Wii and not on PS3 and saying its the biggest megaton was just pointless...

And CAPCOM develop this game to be high budget according to screens so far and to be AAA title will be a moot too because it will not gain sales, according to you.

DANG! What CAPCOM and Wii fans are THINKING?!!

And yeah, dont judge the popularity of a game so soon if it didnt come out yet.