Pretty much, IE sucks, even Safari is better.

 That's like saying that visiting one person's house which stinks of cabbage to look at cake pictures is better than going to another person's house that stinks of cabbage to look at cake pictures.

Like comparing shit with a slightly smaller pile of shit (or bigger pile, depending on your fetishes, I'm not one to discriminate).

Like... well, you get my point.

@SamuelRSmith

I missed it.

 Missed what?

I have chrome. It's pretty cool, I like the look, runs well. But I still prefer my FireFox 3. And I notice Chrome runs multiple processes in Ram depending on what your doing, what applications are you running, and how many tabs you have open. Not sure if that's good or bad.... depends on a person RAM and CPU i guess....

Are you saying that HTML is garbage and what people are doing with Javascript is like adding diamonds to a turd?  Because I agree with you, a new paradigm is needed.  HTML was never intended for the rich applications that are now being shoveled into it.

I missed your point. Also, HTML FTW.

I love chrome to be honest. It's much faster then firefox was for me. I also enjoy the look and I know it's going to be very well supported.

Yes, Chrome uses one process per tab, but it uses less RAM than the sum of all its processes. That's because part of that RAM is shared between all the processes.

For example, say you run the Windows Calculator twice. The executable code will only exist once in physical memory, but Task Manager shows the two processes using the same amount of RAM.

First thing I've noticed with Chrome straight away is that I can't scroll by clicking my mouse wheel...

That's a bit shite!

I'm liking the interface of Chrome, here's hoping it get's worked on as often as say Firefox, it could potentially be a serious competitor for browser share.

Google have taken over god knows how much web related, it was only a matter of time for them to enter the actual browser market itself.