By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Too Human: Screw the Haters

coolestguyever on 25 August 2008

haha what a panzee!



Around the Network
Arkk on 25 August 2008
Onyxmeth said:
obieslut said:
Onyxmeth said:
KZ2 said:
Only a MS fanboy would say Too Human is a good game. Majority view it as a mediocre game.

That makes absolutely no sense. I could just as easily say only a Sony fanboy would say Metal Gear Solid 4 is a good game. Why? Oh because one would have to play it on a PS3 to experience it, thus making them a Sony fanboy by default. Just get over it that some people can either see past issues a game has, or not think the same things reviewers consider issues are actually issues at all.

"Majority" don't view Too Human as a mediocre game either. "Majority" read a handful of reviews that said Too Human is mediocre and haven't played it themselves to see.

 

oh come on, but KZ2 isright though and bu the way when MGS4 starts getting 5.5's then we can talk.

 

I'm going to quote KZ2:

"Gamerankings and Metacritic are biased sites and in my books have no credibility. Game reviewers have little or no credibility. 15 year old game reviewers speaks for itself. lol."-KZ2
http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=36916

"BTW: I do not waste my time reading reviews I spend my time playing games not reading about some idiot reviewer has to say about them. Game reviewers are opinionated they lack objectivity."-KZ2
http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=37083

He must not have been talking about review scores since he doesn't believe they have credibility. He must be talking about real people, thus only people that have played the game. Somehow with those views though, he can make snap judgements of a game he doesn't claim to have played in his post.

 

And by the way......................

oh snap! PWNED!!

 



Just kiss the tip.


Darc Requiem on 25 August 2008
Onyxmeth said:
obieslut said:
Onyxmeth said:
KZ2 said:
Only a MS fanboy would say Too Human is a good game. Majority view it as a mediocre game.

That makes absolutely no sense. I could just as easily say only a Sony fanboy would say Metal Gear Solid 4 is a good game. Why? Oh because one would have to play it on a PS3 to experience it, thus making them a Sony fanboy by default. Just get over it that some people can either see past issues a game has, or not think the same things reviewers consider issues are actually issues at all.

"Majority" don't view Too Human as a mediocre game either. "Majority" read a handful of reviews that said Too Human is mediocre and haven't played it themselves to see.

 

oh come on, but KZ2 isright though and bu the way when MGS4 starts getting 5.5's then we can talk.

 

I'm going to quote KZ2:

"Gamerankings and Metacritic are biased sites and in my books have no credibility. Game reviewers have little or no credibility. 15 year old game reviewers speaks for itself. lol."-KZ2
http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=36916

"BTW: I do not waste my time reading reviews I spend my time playing games not reading about some idiot reviewer has to say about them. Game reviewers are opinionated they lack objectivity."-KZ2
http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=37083

He must not have been talking about review scores since he doesn't believe they have credibility. He must be talking about real people, thus only people that have played the game. Somehow with those views though, he can make snap judgements of a game he doesn't claim to have played in his post.

 

I would have linked the "you got owned" website for KZ2 but its down at the moment.

 



Riachu on 25 August 2008
HappySqurriel said:

I haven't played Too Human yet, but I have heard that it is a Diablo clone that isn't nearly as good as Diablo ... Much like whenever a clone of an "older" game is released, there are a lot of people who may never have played the original game and may not see it in such a bad light because they have nothing to compare it against.

 

The only game that reaches Diablo's quality is well, Diablo



 

http://www.youtube.com/user/InvaderZimGuy1?feature=mhum

epinefridis on 25 August 2008

Given the fact that Too Human is already out there, and lots of guys in here have played it and (I strongly believe) liked it, and understood that the reviews where nowhere near the truth (which is IT IS A BLOODY HACK N SLASH GAME, and really fun), I say these to the irritating and boring and predictable teens who haven't even saw a single screen and bash the game . Can you please get the hell outta here?
Thank you.



Around the Network
Onyxmeth on 25 August 2008
KZ2 said:
If a game scores below 80% review average scores I would not even rent the game let alone buy it. But a free demo is a free demo. I did not like the Too Human demo.

Just for those that didn't connect the dots between my previous reply and this new turn of hypocritical events from KZ2:

I'm going to quote KZ2:

"Gamerankings and Metacritic are biased sites and in my books have no credibility. Game reviewers have little or no credibility. 15 year old game reviewers speaks for itself. lol."-KZ2
http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=36916

"BTW: I do not waste my time reading reviews I spend my time playing games not reading about some idiot reviewer has to say about them. Game reviewers are opinionated they lack objectivity."-KZ2
http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=37083

So yes, in this case KZ2 would only buy a game if it review score averages over 80% but in previous arguments he'll lay claim that review scores don't matter and he doesn't use them to judge game quality. Is it quite possible he is only changing stances in this case to slight Too Human? I believe so.

 



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



HappySqurriel on 25 August 2008
Riachu said:
HappySqurriel said:

I haven't played Too Human yet, but I have heard that it is a Diablo clone that isn't nearly as good as Diablo ... Much like whenever a clone of an "older" game is released, there are a lot of people who may never have played the original game and may not see it in such a bad light because they have nothing to compare it against.

 

The only game that reaches Diablo's quality is well, Diablo

 

Which is (part of) the reason why you could see such disparity between people's reactions ...

Guy 1 (never played Diablo): Too Human is amazing
Guy 2 (Diablo 2 Bnet kiddie): Too Human is crap



ROBOTECHHEAVEN on 25 August 2008

i liked too human alot, gonna try the online part soon.



GAMERTAG IS ANIMEHEAVEN X23

PSN ID IS : ANIMEREALM 

PROUD MEMBER OF THE RPG FAN CLUB THREAD

ALL-TIME FAVORITE JRPG IS : LOST ODYSSEY

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=52882&page=1

Darc Requiem on 25 August 2008
HappySqurriel said:
Riachu said:
HappySqurriel said:

I haven't played Too Human yet, but I have heard that it is a Diablo clone that isn't nearly as good as Diablo ... Much like whenever a clone of an "older" game is released, there are a lot of people who may never have played the original game and may not see it in such a bad light because they have nothing to compare it against.

 

The only game that reaches Diablo's quality is well, Diablo

 

Which is (part of) the reason why you could see such disparity between people's reactions ...

Guy 1 (never played Diablo): Too Human is amazing
Guy 2 (Diablo 2 Bnet kiddie): Too Human is crap

I have played Diablo. I actually still have Diablo 2 for PC. I don't think Too Human is crap.



woopah on 25 August 2008

yayy ranting



 nintendo fanboy, but the good kind

proud soldier of nintopia