Bitmap Frogs said:
dbot said:
mrstickball said: dbot -
It means that if Playstation 3 fans argue, and assume that lesser-selling titles such as Resistance 2 and Killzone 2 can move consoles, then why not a game that is much better rated, and better selling? Gears 1 outsold Resistance and Killzone combined. |
mrstickball - It seems like a defensive comment to a fair question. The op is curious as to why people think the GeoW2 will push consoles. It has nothing to do with Sony, Resistance 2, or Killzone 2.
I think Gears of War 2 will be a great game that will sell very well, but I don't see it moving a lot of hardware for reasons previously stated. It is a sequel to a game already released on the 360 and Gears 1/Halo 3 have already brought in the FPS crowd. That being said, I don't see KZ2 or Resistance 2 selling any hardware either. But I expect both to be good games.
|
And he gave you a legitimate answer: the same guys who claim KZ2 and R2 to be systemsellers shout out loud that gears 2 won't move units using reasons in their arguments that could easily be applied to R2 at least.
|
Correct. I was using something called "Logic". Many Sony fans assume that R2 and KZ2 will move consoles, so my argument was that if that argument holds true, then it should hold true for a bigger, more popular game.
dbot's second statement follows my logic: I wasn't trying to defend Gears. Merely employ logic that we all can follow. If you feel that Gears 2 won't move consoles, that's your opinion. But it's impossible not to find the paralell between R2/KZ2 arguments and Gears 2 arguments.