Now I wanna see all those riled up Sony fanboys who were condemning moneyhats as if they were a cardinal sin to take their gentle time spitting on Sony for bribing a developer [again, since they used to do that before the ps2 became so dominant it stopped being necessary].

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=38901

EDGE? Is that what we are calling it now?

The pits of hell are too hot for my taste, I prefer the warmer climate of the general gaming discussion.

I wouldn't hold my breath. There's been a thread or two on this, and there's been zero complaining about the evils of moneyhatting from the people who bitch a blue streak when M$ does it.

I'm afraid you're going to have to be more specific on who exactly was spitting on MS for moneyhatting. Otherwise you'll get no results.

As for me, if people truly think that MS didn't moneyhat to get IU and timed exclusivity for TLR (as I've seen some claim) I see no reason that this has to be a moneyhat. Now if you (like me) admit that there was mostly moneyhatting involved for TLR and IU, then I will admit that there is mostly moneyhatting involved for Mirror's edge.

Bring sunblock, it helps.
OT: If these rumors have any substance it could mean... basically nothing. An underdog title that has everything to prove, on the platform that has done the decidedly worst out of all three compared to expectations worldwide.
Smells like a whole lot of nothing to me.

Can it be considered moneyhatting for Infinite Undiscovery when Microsoft was originally going to publish it and (apparently) owns the IP?

Hmmm....I don't know, how bout we just stick to TLR since I'm not well versed enough on IU and haven't kept up with it?  I ammend my previous statement to be just TLR since I don't know enough about IU.

what is EDGE