I dont know about the rest of you but since my first halo link session with 16 players, i have yearned for a mmfps. with the start of the 7th gen i had hopes of seeing games with up to 200 people playing. i have read previews here and there and 64 is a very nice improvement. but i would like to see in on maps the size of the original mercinaries maps, or larger, where multiple battles rage and multiple factions fight.  is that too much to ask, have the building/ground deformation found in mercs/BF:bc.  battles that rage for hour maybe days that you join and leave as needed. 

PlanetSide?

mag

Huxley??

MAG is 256 Players Online at one time, Altho im not sure if its FPS/TPS

im hoping mag might do it but it seems to be more like C&C with individual unit control form at list the videos ive seen... and the top down view, i honestly dont know enough about mag

plantside os not on console is it? im not a big fan of computer fps's. i have a few old games but just dont enjoy it.

Get a ps3 this coming spring. MAG - 256 Players online. But I think it will most likely be 3rd person, like socom.

huxley looks good, thanks ... dont know how i missed it

I remember back in Battlefield2142 I would stay away from 64 player matches like plague. 40 people was my favorite amount, enough people so you can get a lot of action but not so many people that you get killed the moment you spawn. When a server has too many people matches tend to turn into giant clusterfucks where everything is about luck. Plus, it is hard enough to get 10-20 people to work together, imagine how hard it is to get several times that amount.

@chemical, thats why they need massive maps in with the large amount of ppeople, i tried battle field 2142, always felt the maps were a bit small very true about getting them to work togeather maybe if they worked it into squads like BF:BC maybe a 5-6 in a unit... four feels just a little too small.