The 250 stores were in 2007.
STAGE how many times do i have to tell you google is your friend.
Show me where HD-DVD was doing better than blu-ray in blockbuster.
FACT: Blu-ray did better for Warner and Blockbuster and target thats why they switched. Why keep a product that you have to buy just for it to sit on shelves and not even get reimbursed for it?
| LOL MATURE said: STAGE how many times do i have to tell you google is your friend. Show me where HD-DVD was doing better than blu-ray in blockbuster. FACT: Blu-ray did better for Warner and Blockbuster and target thats why they switched. Why keep a product that you have to buy just for it to sit on shelves and not even get reimbursed for it? |
Im talking about overall. Blockbuster is the least of my worries for proof. If you want proof look at HD-DVDs sales against Blu Ray before all of the politics started.
FACT: If the major movie studios say switch and Blu Ray has alot more of them than HD-DVD, then Blu Ray wins. Politics is politics.
Let me sum up this thread given the following assuptions made in the OP
WOULD'VE ... COULD'VE ... SHOULD'VE?? ..... but DIDN'T ...
/thread =P haha
Nah probably not ... given the higher price tag it wouldnt have sold as many as it did ...
Not trying to troll or anything, but wouldn't the 360 with HD-DVD still have the same RROD failure rate that plagued the console in the first year? I'm pretty sure that that would have put off way more ppl into buying a $600 console that has a chance of catching RROD. That would have resulted in much less sales (mainly cuz of price tag), would have given HD-DVD a bad name because of the 360's "false start" and I think it would have forced MS to have waited another year to release (I know, hypothetical situation, I just think that MS would have waited for parts to be cheaper before launching a 360 with an HD-DVD built in)
Seriously the Playstation struggled to sell with the price due to blu ray. They would have been in serious trouble and there definitely would of been no lead with the install base for long
Ynwa.
no sony would have beaten hd dvd anyways.
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
No but it would have taken more exclusivse away due to more memory and the formate would have lasted so as long the used the format for the 360 also i could have blu-ray a run for its money.
![]()
Onyxmeth said:
I don't think a $600 price tag would have worked out too well for the 360. Sony luckily had a brand name they could run through the mud to catch on with Blu Ray. Microsoft didn't have that luxury coming off the Xbox.
|
yeah that's pretty much my feeling.
I like the thought you put into the thread though. Good job.
"Let justice be done though the heavens fall." - Jim Garrison
"Ask not your horse, if ye should ride into battle" - myself