Mendicate Bias said:
SaviorX said: Zelda. Philips CD-I tarnished its good name. j/k
I don't think DMC4 & Halo were exactly 'shattering'. I'm not sure about what the response was to DQIX. The others were understandable & Rare was actually necessary. I don't know anything about Contra/Castlevania or Street Fighter II. |
If Halo had gone to the mac and been a huge success then we very well might have seen Apple make a push into the gaming market. As it stands now if you want a gaming computer you get a pc, end of story.
|
This isn't completely accurate. Bungie began life as an Mac-only developer, but by the time Halo came around they were developing for the Mac AND PC. Had MS not purchased Bungie to make Halo an Xbox exclusive launch title, the game would have been simultaneously released on both Mac and PC.
Several Apple executives, including Jobs, destroyed the Mac as a gaming platform. They kept discouraging game publishers because they felt that games on the Mac would give people the impression that it was a "toy" computer. By the time Apple realized that FPS and RTS games were driving PC hardware upgrades, the PC was well entrenched as the gaming machine of choice.
So... although having Halo as an exclusive title on the Mac might have helped Apple in the short term, it was already too late for Mac to become the machine of choice for games, and doing a Mac exclusive with Halo wasn't Bungie's plan in any event.
And before someone accuses me of being biased toward PC gaming, I had a Mac as my only home machine during the events, above, and was really disappointed to find that Halo wasn't coming to the Mac for a long, long time. The game was basically finished for Mac when MS bought Bungie.