By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Red Alert!!! - PS3 'very exotic and tough to develop for'

gebx on 28 July 2008
steven787 said:
colonelstubbs said:
gebx said:
colonelstubbs said:
twesterm said:
Lay off gebx, sure, it is a pretty anti-Sony article but he didn't write it, he only posted it. Get mad at the person that wrote the article, discuss why it's right or wrong, and just be calm about things. In the end, if you don't like it just don't read it.

Also, believe me, for every anti-Sony person there is an anti-other console person.

 

 Sorry but if something against the 360 was posted in the MS forum by a known sony fan (the exact opposite of whats happened here) there would be warnings and/or bans.

Here http://vgchartz.com/forum/board.php?page=91&id=6&sort=

This is where the banned MS threads start... please find me examples..

 

 Im not looking through 91 pages of threads! Im sorry

It's starts at 91 then goes to 98.  7 pages.

 

The point is that after E3 how many anti Nintendo Articles were posted?  (A bunch and all by Vaio a Nintendo fan)

The point is to discuss the article.

For the record in the MS forum on the first 3 pages alone these are the negative threads.

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=35130 - OP's First Line "Why?Because I hate MS?...Why should I?"

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=35589 - OP Rants and continues with "blame the suckbox...oops....I mean xbox 360"

 

Look at these perfect first two examples..  Yet not locked or banned...



Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)

                   

Around the Network
Bobo012893 on 28 July 2008
ocnkng said:
disolitude said:
docholliday said:
Honestly every topic i've seen this guy make has been sometype of stab at sony, I think he spends more time on sony forums making these type of posts than he does on MS lol.

 

And you've been here for 42 posts so you have the right to make claims like these...give me a break. 

 

You think there are separate rights that a user has based upon how many number of posts he/she has made?

Is this the way this site works..I'll be curious to know.

And are you the one who is laying out this set of laws?

 

 Preach!



Feel free to add me as your friend-PSN ID: Bobo012893

GlingGling on 28 July 2008
axumblade said:
Burgles said:
Jordahn said:
This news goes to show that those who have a decent handle on PS3 development have been able to develop visually higher quality games (such as the recent Soul Calibur IV) than it's multi-platform counterpart. And being and "exotic" system to develop for implies the potential of the console itself for the long run. Maybe the "10 year" lifespan of the PS3 might have more validity.


 No it doesn't, where's your reasoning for saying that?

Basides, in an RTS the CPU is the main problem and I believe the way in which an RTS does stuff is going to be much more complicated to get going smoothly (lots of different AI stuff happening at the same time) on the PS3 due to the way it handles stuff...

Have a look on Wikipedia on the "Cell" and you'll find out a lot :)

oh. Okay. Wikipedia. Cause we all know that that's the most reliable website to back you up. I'd believe Nintendo Power posting on the Cell processor before I'd believe Wikipedia. A Website where people can actually edit articles.

A large amount of the information on wikipedia is sourced. It's also heavily monitored for blatently false information. It is the best one stop shop for accurate information on the internet. If you find a better one let us know. You may think of wikipedia this way. The more popular a topic is the more likely it is to be accurate, they even have a rating system. If you don't believe me check the discussion page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cell_(microprocessor)



steven787 on 28 July 2008
gebx said:
steven787 said:
colonelstubbs said:
gebx said:
colonelstubbs said:
twesterm said:
Lay off gebx, sure, it is a pretty anti-Sony article but he didn't write it, he only posted it. Get mad at the person that wrote the article, discuss why it's right or wrong, and just be calm about things. In the end, if you don't like it just don't read it.

Also, believe me, for every anti-Sony person there is an anti-other console person.

 

 Sorry but if something against the 360 was posted in the MS forum by a known sony fan (the exact opposite of whats happened here) there would be warnings and/or bans.

Here http://vgchartz.com/forum/board.php?page=91&id=6&sort=

This is where the banned MS threads start... please find me examples..

 

 Im not looking through 91 pages of threads! Im sorry

It's starts at 91 then goes to 98.  7 pages.

 

The point is that after E3 how many anti Nintendo Articles were posted?  (A bunch and all by Vaio a Nintendo fan)

The point is to discuss the article.

For the record in the MS forum on the first 3 pages alone these are the negative threads.

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=35130 - OP's First Line "Why?Because I hate MS?...Why should I?"

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=35589 - OP Rants and continues with "blame the suckbox...oops....I mean xbox 360"

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=35134

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=35256

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=31432

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=35390

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=35337

 

Look at these perfect first two examples..  Yet not locked or banned...

Wait.... somebody actually read one of my data filled posts... Gebx you're awesome (for a 360 fanboy).

 



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

Xen on 28 July 2008

Oh no, we lost an RTS... on a freakin console.. I bet this will be as disappointing as C&C 3 was.



Around the Network
gebx on 28 July 2008
TheRealMafoo said:
gebx said:
whofwhof said:
stfu little microsoft fanboy, how cares

i guess u dont have enough money for buy a ps3 loser XD

 

LOL! I love to know who's alt account you are..

 

 

Probably yours. The only reason you post shit like this, is to get this kind of reaction out of 13 year olds. I could see you doing this just so you feel like you have "won".

it's like sending flowers to yourself :p

 

 Oh come one.. if I had done that then I would of imitated DMJ's writing and I would of personally pointed it out.. give me some credit at least :)



Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)

                   

Pristine20 on 28 July 2008
disolitude said:
docholliday said:
Honestly every topic i've seen this guy make has been sometype of stab at sony, I think he spends more time on sony forums making these type of posts than he does on MS lol.

 

And you've been here for 42 posts so you have the right to make claims like these...give me a break. 

 

 I personally lurked vgchartz for about a year before starting to post so he might have been around.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Words Of Wisdom on 28 July 2008
Xen said:
Oh no, we lost an RTS... on a freakin console.. I bet this will be as disappointing as C&C 3 was.

Ah yes, rule #6 of the console wars:  The game must automatically suck if it is not coming to your console.


Still, a console RTS will likely suck for other reasons.



Jordahn on 28 July 2008
Burgles said:
Jordahn said:
This news goes to show that those who have a decent handle on PS3 development have been able to develop visually higher quality games (such as the recent Soul Calibur IV) than it's multi-platform counterpart. And being and "exotic" system to develop for implies the potential of the console itself for the long run. Maybe the "10 year" lifespan of the PS3 might have more validity.

 

 No it doesn't, where's your reasoning for saying that?

Basides, in an RTS the CPU is the main problem and I believe the way in which an RTS does stuff is going to be much more complicated to get going smoothly (lots of different AI stuff happening at the same time) on the PS3 due to the way it handles stuff...

Have a look on Wikipedia on the "Cell" and you'll find out a lot :)

"On a decent 720p TV Soul Calibur IV is one of the best looking games on the PS3, and for once better looking than the 360 version, and is the ideal thing to put on when a mate pops round."

http://www.play-mag.co.uk/ps3/games/soul_calibur_iv/soul_calibur_iv.html

Exotic (adjective) = alien, alluring, different, elaborate, enticing, fantastic, foreign, kinky, mysterious, outlandish, romatic, strange, striking, unusual.

http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/exotic

Quit being so insecure.

 

Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.

Xen on 28 July 2008
Words Of Wisdom said:
Xen said:
Oh no, we lost an RTS... on a freakin console.. I bet this will be as disappointing as C&C 3 was.

Ah yes, rule #6 of the console wars:  The game must automatically suck if it is not coming to your console.


Still, a console RTS will likely suck for other reasons.

No mate, it's not because of rule #6 or anything. C&C 3 wasn't developed by Westwood. Result - glamorous, souless game, in the EA style. My bet is that will be the case with Red Alert 3.