By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Famitsu 360 reviews Tales of Vesperia and others

ZenfoldorVGI on 28 July 2008
colonelstubbs said:
Oh yeah, so Famitsu gives 360 games a good score, and suddenly nobody is saying 'famitsu is useless' and 'dont trust famitsu' anymore.

Typical!

You know, you're slowly becoming the biggest troll on this forum. You think nobody watches you, but I do. You jump on virtually every post that says something positive about the 360 or Wii, or negative about the PS3, and say something derogative about how everyone treats the PS3 unfairly or this and that. Just look at your posting history.

It has now officially gotten on my nerves.

I ask that you at least break it up with a non-disposable post every once in a while.

You might as well be trolling for post count. Hint, the explaination point after "typical" ruins your guise of serious cat trolling.

 

Also, nobody gonna question the obvious descrepancy of the fact that I pointed out that at least one of the scores in the OP is misquoted and wrong?



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Around the Network
Tommie on 28 July 2008
ZenfoldorVGI said:
http://www.n4g.com/News-173993.aspx

There's a descripency here. How sure are we this is real? N4G is reporting that SCIV scored: 9-9-9-8(35/40)

1 point higher than you say it scored.

Who is correct?

The thing is, there are different types of Famitsu magazine. There the regular one, which covers all the platforms including handhelds and all consoles. The regular Famitsu gave SCIV 36/40, I knew that.

These reviews come from Famitsu Xbox 360, which is a special version of the Famitsu magazine which only covers the Xbox 360. Its a totally different magazine with totally different reviews, so that explains the differences in review scores.

Source: www.gamefront.de

 



You aint found shit!

colonelstubbs on 28 July 2008
ZenfoldorVGI said:
colonelstubbs said:
Oh yeah, so Famitsu gives 360 games a good score, and suddenly nobody is saying 'famitsu is useless' and 'dont trust famitsu' anymore.

Typical!

You know, you're slowly becoming the biggest troll on this forum. You think nobody watches you, but I do. You jump on virtually every post that says something positive about the 360 or Wii, or negative about the PS3, and say something derogative about how everyone treats the PS3 unfairly or this and that. Just look at your posting history.

It has now officially gotten on my nerves.

I ask that you at least break it up with a non-disposable post every once in a while.

You might as well be trolling for post count. Hint, the explaination point after "typical" ruins your guise of serious cat trolling.

 

Also, nobody gonna question the obvious descrepancy of the fact that I pointed out that at least one of the scores in the OP is misquoted and wrong?

And looking at your profile mr zenfolder, you got banned yourself only 10 days ago. What happened there?

 



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot

ZenfoldorVGI on 28 July 2008
Tommie said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
http://www.n4g.com/News-173993.aspx

There's a descripency here. How sure are we this is real? N4G is reporting that SCIV scored: 9-9-9-8(35/40)

1 point higher than you say it scored.

Who is correct?

The thing is, there are different types of Famitsu magazine. There the regular one, which covers all the platforms including handhelds and all consoles. The regular Famitsu gave SCIV 36/40, I knew that.

These reviews come from Famitsu Xbox 360, which is a special version of the Famitsu magazine which only covers the Xbox 360. Its a totally different magazine with totally different reviews, so that explains the differences in review scores.

Source: www.gamefront.de

 

So, this isn't the normal reviewers who do the reviews for the main magazine? This is a Famitsu spinoff dedicated to the Xbox 360?

 



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Outcast on 28 July 2008
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Tommie said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
http://www.n4g.com/News-173993.aspx

There's a descripency here. How sure are we this is real? N4G is reporting that SCIV scored: 9-9-9-8(35/40)

1 point higher than you say it scored.

Who is correct?

The thing is, there are different types of Famitsu magazine. There the regular one, which covers all the platforms including handhelds and all consoles. The regular Famitsu gave SCIV 36/40, I knew that.

These reviews come from Famitsu Xbox 360, which is a special version of the Famitsu magazine which only covers the Xbox 360. Its a totally different magazine with totally different reviews, so that explains the differences in review scores.

Source: www.gamefront.de

 

So, this isn't the normal reviewers who do the reviews for the main magazine? This is a Famitsu spinoff dedicated to the Xbox 360?

 

That's a rather confusing way to do things.

 



Around the Network
ZenfoldorVGI on 28 July 2008
colonelstubbs said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
colonelstubbs said:
Oh yeah, so Famitsu gives 360 games a good score, and suddenly nobody is saying 'famitsu is useless' and 'dont trust famitsu' anymore.

Typical!

You know, you're slowly becoming the biggest troll on this forum. You think nobody watches you, but I do. You jump on virtually every post that says something positive about the 360 or Wii, or negative about the PS3, and say something derogative about how everyone treats the PS3 unfairly or this and that. Just look at your posting history.

It has now officially gotten on my nerves.

I ask that you at least break it up with a non-disposable post every once in a while.

You might as well be trolling for post count. Hint, the explaination point after "typical" ruins your guise of serious cat trolling.

Also, nobody gonna question the obvious descrepancy of the fact that I pointed out that at least one of the scores in the OP is misquoted and wrong?

And looking at your profile mr zenfolder, you got banned yourself only 10 days ago. What happened there?

 

It's Zenfold"or"

I hurt peoples feelings.

They got over it.

I solve problems. You create them.

Try not to directly address me unless you have something important to say. I'm not interested in playing your "gotcha" game. I'm above that. Aren't you?

Don't ever assume that I'm an ordinary poster that got "punished" for "zomg breaking a rule."

I'm not 10, sir. When I break rules, I do so knowingly and am fully prepared to accept the consequences.

I felt my ban worth it, and everything I said was simply the truth. If that is too controversial for people to accept sometimes, then so be it. I'll set out a day for my beliefs.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

ZenfoldorVGI on 28 July 2008
Outcast said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Tommie said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
http://www.n4g.com/News-173993.aspx

There's a descripency here. How sure are we this is real? N4G is reporting that SCIV scored: 9-9-9-8(35/40)

1 point higher than you say it scored.

Who is correct?

The thing is, there are different types of Famitsu magazine. There the regular one, which covers all the platforms including handhelds and all consoles. The regular Famitsu gave SCIV 36/40, I knew that.

These reviews come from Famitsu Xbox 360, which is a special version of the Famitsu magazine which only covers the Xbox 360. Its a totally different magazine with totally different reviews, so that explains the differences in review scores.

Source: www.gamefront.de

 

So, this isn't the normal reviewers who do the reviews for the main magazine? This is a Famitsu spinoff dedicated to the Xbox 360?

 

That's a rather confusing way to do things.

 

It also means these reviews mean even less than normal Famitsu reviews do, which is already very little.

In other words, we only thought Vesperia got a good review. it might still get a bad review, and SoulCalibur IV got a slightly better review than we first thought.

 



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

colonelstubbs on 28 July 2008
ZenfoldorVGI said:
colonelstubbs said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
colonelstubbs said:
Oh yeah, so Famitsu gives 360 games a good score, and suddenly nobody is saying 'famitsu is useless' and 'dont trust famitsu' anymore.

Typical!

You know, you're slowly becoming the biggest troll on this forum. You think nobody watches you, but I do. You jump on virtually every post that says something positive about the 360 or Wii, or negative about the PS3, and say something derogative about how everyone treats the PS3 unfairly or this and that. Just look at your posting history.

It has now officially gotten on my nerves.

I ask that you at least break it up with a non-disposable post every once in a while.

You might as well be trolling for post count. Hint, the explaination point after "typical" ruins your guise of serious cat trolling.

Also, nobody gonna question the obvious descrepancy of the fact that I pointed out that at least one of the scores in the OP is misquoted and wrong?

And looking at your profile mr zenfolder, you got banned yourself only 10 days ago. What happened there?

 

It's Zenfold"or"

I hurt peoples feelings.

They got over it.

I solve problems. You create them.

Try not to directly address me unless you have something important to say. I'm not interested in playing your "gotcha" game. I'm above that. Aren't you?

Don't ever assume that I'm an ordinary poster that got "punished" for "zomg breaking a rule."

I'm not 10, sir. When I break rules, I do so knowingly and am fully prepared to accept the consequences.

I felt my ban worth it, and everything I said was simply the truth. If that is too controversial for people to accept sometimes, then so be it. I'll set out a day for my beliefs.

You're quite arrogant. Maybe you should see someone about that

 



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot

starcraft on 28 July 2008
Squilliam said:
starcraft said:
Squilliam said:
starcraft said:
GAH!!!

I wish Benga would just buy a 360 already, the suspense is killing me.

OT: This game sounds better than I expected. Too bad PAL has to wait till 2009

What?!!?!?

You're teasing me I hope...

No unfortunately. It was a nasty surprise hidden under a lot of good surprises at Microsoft's JRPG-fest a month or so back.

I forget that we're PALS sometimes...

PALS!!!! FOREVA!!!!!

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

shams on 28 July 2008
colonelstubbs said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
colonelstubbs said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
colonelstubbs said:
Oh yeah, so Famitsu gives 360 games a good score, and suddenly nobody is saying 'famitsu is useless' and 'dont trust famitsu' anymore.

Typical!

You know, you're slowly becoming the biggest troll on this forum. You think nobody watches you, but I do. You jump on virtually every post that says something positive about the 360 or Wii, or negative about the PS3, and say something derogative about how everyone treats the PS3 unfairly or this and that. Just look at your posting history.

It has now officially gotten on my nerves.

I ask that you at least break it up with a non-disposable post every once in a while.

You might as well be trolling for post count. Hint, the explaination point after "typical" ruins your guise of serious cat trolling.

Also, nobody gonna question the obvious descrepancy of the fact that I pointed out that at least one of the scores in the OP is misquoted and wrong?

And looking at your profile mr zenfolder, you got banned yourself only 10 days ago. What happened there?

 

It's Zenfold"or"

I hurt peoples feelings.

They got over it.

I solve problems. You create them.

Try not to directly address me unless you have something important to say. I'm not interested in playing your "gotcha" game. I'm above that. Aren't you?

Don't ever assume that I'm an ordinary poster that got "punished" for "zomg breaking a rule."

I'm not 10, sir. When I break rules, I do so knowingly and am fully prepared to accept the consequences.

I felt my ban worth it, and everything I said was simply the truth. If that is too controversial for people to accept sometimes, then so be it. I'll set out a day for my beliefs.

You're quite arrogant. Maybe you should see someone about that

 

Guys, drop it - now.

This is what happens when a little leniency on the part of mods results in a simple thread turning into a slag fest.

@colonelstubbs - whether you like it or not, you did start this - and your last post was very unnecessary (and purely personal). If you have something to say to someone - either PM them, or complain to a mod.

I'm going to have to give you a little slap for this - 1 day ban. Don't do it again.

 



Gesta Non Verba

Nocturnal is helping companies get cheaper game ratings in Australia:

Game Assessment website

Wii code: 2263 4706 2910 1099