Outcast said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Tommie said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
http://www.n4g.com/News-173993.aspx
There's a descripency here. How sure are we this is real? N4G is reporting that SCIV scored: 9-9-9-8(35/40)
1 point higher than you say it scored.
Who is correct? |
The thing is, there are different types of Famitsu magazine. There the regular one, which covers all the platforms including handhelds and all consoles. The regular Famitsu gave SCIV 36/40, I knew that.
These reviews come from Famitsu Xbox 360, which is a special version of the Famitsu magazine which only covers the Xbox 360. Its a totally different magazine with totally different reviews, so that explains the differences in review scores.
Source: www.gamefront.de
|
So, this isn't the normal reviewers who do the reviews for the main magazine? This is a Famitsu spinoff dedicated to the Xbox 360?
|
That's a rather confusing way to do things.
|
It also means these reviews mean even less than normal Famitsu reviews do, which is already very little.
In other words, we only thought Vesperia got a good review. it might still get a bad review, and SoulCalibur IV got a slightly better review than we first thought.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
