By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - This trend of spitting on casual gamers...

Bodhesatva said:
ckmlb said:
Bodhesatva said:
ckmlb said:
People who watch crappy movies carry the movie industry, should they get respect?

Same with people who listen to crap music.

Except the movies that are valuable have artistic merit. The "great games" you speak of do not, and usually have less maturity than the casual games. That's my problem. The "crappy movies" you talk about are things like Pirates of the Caribbean, and Blade, and Spawn, and Men in Black, and Independance Day, et. al. Correct? Then please notice this:

These are big budget movies with tons of action, usually a good deal of violence, and often a good deal of sex. They usually target 15-25 year old males first and foremost.

The "great games" you're talking about have tons of action, usually a good deal of violence, and often a good deal of sexuality. They usually target 15-25 year old males first and foremost.

It's games like Gears of War that are analogous to those "crappy movies."

The art house flicks are usually low budget, have little violence or action, and are enjoyed largely by adults.

The casual games are usually low budget, have little violence or action, and are enjoyed much more by adults than hardcore games.

It's the games like Wii Sports and The Sims that are analogous to art house flicks.

I've said this before, Ck, but you have it backwards. If you MUST make this analogy, it's God of War/Gears of War/Heavenly Sword that are equivalent to the crappy, blockbuster movies, and the casual games that are equivalent to art house flicks.

You generalize again as always that games are not mature and mini game collections are and there's no convincing you otherwise, because supposedly popping balloons on screen is the mature thing to do and fighting people on it isn't.

Also do you want me to go again into the artistic games debate: Ico, Shadow of the Colossus, Okami are games that are artistic. It's up to the people who make games to decide how artistic they make them.

Wii Play and this crap is equivilant to an art house flick in one way only: they are cheaply made by gaming and movie standards. Just cause these games are simple and made on the cheap doesn't make them art house flicks. If I went out now and taped a bunch of crap and then made it into a movie it wouldn't be artistic cause it's cheap...

 

There is "no convincing me" because all the evidence says you're wrong. The best examples of intelligent adult games are Civilization, Brain Age, The Sims, and Tetris (the latter three of which have seen exclusive incarnations on Nintendo platforms, the middle two Wii exclusives). Yes, I am telling you those are absolutely more mature games than anything you seem to prefer. And again, it shows -- adults play those games a great deal more than they play MGS/God of War/Gears of War.

And yes, absolutely, "fighting people" tends to be less mature. What do you think it is that makes those "crappy movies" so crappy? Why is it that good movies are profoundly less action-oriented? Why are all the blockbuster "Crappy movies" about Spider Man kicking ass, or Will Smith kicking ass, or Jack Sparrow Kicking ass? With the infrequent exception of some War movies such as Apocalypse Now and Saving Private Ryan -- which are basically the ONLY violent films that male teens don't want to watch -- violence tends to be immature.

The games you apparently prefer are almost uniformly about a super soldier/person/spy killing dozens, hundreds or even thousands of enemies in a single mission. It's absurd, and childish, and so perfectly analogous to the "crappy movies" you're talking about I can't imagine why you dont' see it.

 

 


 Who says I don't like Tetris style games? Who says I don't like the sims? You assume I don't like these games because I also play Gears of War or God of War. Shows how narrow minded you are. I guess I will go play my bloody teen games now and leave this conversation to the adults with their brain ages.



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

Around the Network

It might have been kiddie playing video games years ago when the older generations were non gamers, but now the average age of the person playing Halo is not in the low teens and it will go further and further up as gamers grow up and there are more of them in the coming generations.

To somehow tell me that violent video games are immature is pretty baseless as violence is probably the topic that has most interested man throughout the ages and engaging in simulated violence does not make it automatically less than playing a strategy game.



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

Oh come on ckmlb, in your list of favorite movies you list 300! Now that is not fair. Just because you like Marilyn Manson doesn't mean that 50 cents is ruining music. To me basically the music is the same. if for example you listened to chopin or vivaldi, then your argument could make sense.
The thing is, in your eyes you are hardcore, while in a true hardcore musician you are definitely super softcore. Obviously you can't keep on insisting that whoever you like is hardcore, while the rest is softcore.
To me someone who is truly hardcore still enjoys pacman, while no graphics at all.
I don't mean this specificly to you, it applys to everyone who feels like you.



Super soft core musician... ok then.



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

gorgepir said:
Oh come on ckmlb, in your list of favorite movies you list 300! Now that is not fair. Just because you like Marilyn Manson doesn't mean that 50 cents is ruining music. To me basically the music is the same. if for example you listened to chopin or vivaldi, then your argument could make sense.
The thing is, in your eyes you are hardcore, while in a true hardcore musician you are definitely super softcore. Obviously you can't keep on insisting that whoever you like is hardcore, while the rest is softcore.
To me someone who is truly hardcore still enjoys pacman, while no graphics at all.
I don't mean this specificly to you, it applys to everyone who feels like you.

 Again with the assumptions about me being a graphics whore. Where did I state that? Where did I ever say a game that looks better graphically is automatically better than a game that has no graphics at all? To me recently some of the best games I've played have been Lumines, Rez, Planet Puzzle League, Guitar Hero which literally all are minimalists in graphics.



Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!

Around the Network
ckmlb said:
Bodhesatva said:
ckmlb said:
tabsina said:
ckmlb said:
People who watch crappy movies carry the movie industry, should they get respect?

Same with people who listen to crap music.

 

offtopic addition: ... or watch reality shows

 


Reality show watchers contribute to tv stations making money, should I respect the people who watch that garbage?


Gears of War, God of War, Killzone, and so forth are simply no better. They're violent fantasy lands for young males.

Your suggestion that these games are sophisticated, while Reality shows are for philistines, is patently and obviously false. Educated adults don't watch many reality shows, I agree with that. Nielson has consistently shown that the primary audience for these types of shows are in the 15-30 year old range.

And guess what? The games you apparently think are way more sophisticated attract the exact same people. Just as adults tend to prefer Law and Order (or don't watch T.V. at all), adults tend to prefer Wii Sports to Metal Gear, The Sims to Gears of War, and Civilization to God of War.

Again, what does this tell you? It tells you that you have it backwards. It's YOUR games that target younger people. It's YOUR games that are equivalent to "crappy movies", and it's YOUR games that target the same demographic as reality shows. So please, stop.


First of all, don't call them my games. Second of all: what demographic does Wii Sports target? It targets people who treat games as little meaningless passtimes and little kids. Who else targets little kids? The teletubbies. So should I go around saying that these games are the equivilant of the teletubbies? Your point is pretty ridiculous.

Who cares what demographic they target? The idea that it is targetting this demographic meaning it is by default non artistic is wrong. So there's no one who likes artistic stuff in this demographic?

You are making yourself feel good by claiming that you are playing the 'adult' games because you swing a wii mote as a tennis racket rather than a sword... pretty BS if you ask me.


Demographics are really the only possible way to clearly define art. Otherwise, you can claim that Lord of the Rings is as deep and serious a work as Shakespeare, and I literally have no way to argue against it, other than to say that well educated people tend to disagree. What else do I say? Other than writing a thesis paper, I have nothing else. 

Simple example! Find any fine artistic medium -- Opera, Classical Music, or heck, even Bob Dylan, Art House Movies, Great Literature, Sculpture, Painting, Architecture -- any one that is preferred by 15-23 year old males and shunned by adults. Guess what, they don't exist! 

Now, let's name the "crappy" arts, as you put it. I can find a ton -- reality shows, action movies, horror movies, pop music. Guess what? These all target the same audience as God of War. 15-25 year old males.

Again, there's absolutely no way to "prove" that Shakespeare is more sophisticated than, say, Uwe Bole movies. What do I say, other than "obviously, it is?" The only thing we have to go by is who tends to be attracted to these different mediums, as well educated adults would, in general, greatly prefer Shakespeare to "Blood Rayne." The fact that reality shows and "crappy movies" that you so demean are enjoyed by the SAME DEMOGRAPHIC that likes God of War is the best possible objective evidence one can give that these are analogous. 



http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">

ckmlb said:
twesterm said:
ckmlb said:
People who watch crappy movies carry the movie industry, should they get respect?

Same with people who listen to crap music.

Who are you to say they are crap? As long as someone likes them, that's all that matters. If not enough people like it, it will stop. I watch my fair share of artsy movies, I even use to go to the Angelika all the time since my girlfriend use to work there, but then I also enjoy movies like Bio-Dome. As someone likes those crap movies, what is wrong with making them?

As for casual games ruining the industry, that's just crap. There will always be "hardcore" games because there will always be people that want to buy those games. As those games get more in demand, there will be more made.


By that logic anything that has people wanting it is good. So 50 Cent is a musical genius right? That last Spiderman movie it really made me ask some questions about life and my humanity really...


 Once again, who am I (or you) to say the someone's opinion is wrong?  I think 50 Cent or P Diddy Puff Dude or whatever name is are all absolute crap and sounds like a CD is skipping but I know that there are people that actually like that garbage and think the things I like are garbage.

As for Spiderman, the movie was all around bad just because they decided to find out what the limit was that could be put in a movie and then add more but it did have some great action sequences that made it worth watching.  Once again, just because you hated it doesn't mean it wasn't worth making, the fact that you saw it says something.  I suppose a good ending point would be that games are about making money before anything, not about making fun (though the more fun the more money). 



I'm just glad he doesn't listen to Tool.



See Ya George.

"He did not die - He passed Away"

At least following a comedians own jokes makes his death easier.

ckmlb said:
Super soft core musician... ok then.

Yup. If you didnt understand I could explain it again. Since you listen to Marilyn Manson and types like him(and I myself am also in this catagory) the Pavarotti and Placido Domingo's consider you softcore and very very shallow. Thats the way it is. They consider themselves hardcore (and in my opinion rightfully so)

I also never said anything about you being a graphical whore. I just stated my opinion on the matter there. What I meant by that sentence was that a true hardcore gamer would not be attached to the graphics as much as most people here are (not necassarily you). The pacman example was to prove my point.



ckmlb said:
It might have been kiddie playing video games years ago when the older generations were non gamers, but now the average age of the person playing Halo is not in the low teens and it will go further and further up as gamers grow up and there are more of them in the coming generations.

To somehow tell me that violent video games are immature is pretty baseless as violence is probably the topic that has most interested man throughout the ages and engaging in simulated violence does not make it automatically less than playing a strategy game.

Here's another task for you, Ckmlb:

Go find me any movie or book, ever, that has been canonized and deals with a super spy killing hundreds of bad guys. Any one. Or heck, how about a super soldier killing hundreds of space aliens? Or a World War II soldier killing hundreds of Nazis? 

 



http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">