^this is where it is,its in the end

Far Cry 2 is also a beautiful game, at least on PC. Clever shading based on layers not textures means the game can scale to your PC, and the powerful demonstration machine displayed a crisp, sun-drenched, coherent and detailed landscape; one both functional and flattering, given the decision to all but scrap a HUD. Requirements will be typically lower than bitter rival Crysis, we're told, but Far Cry 2 will happily get the most out of even the most monstrous rig. Redding describes the console versions as comparable to a "medium load-out on PC", and warns us that, "graphically you're going to notice slight differences". Which we did. The Xbox 360 was the better of the two with its anti-aliasing, but both looked unspectacular and even drab in points. Far from ugly, mind you.

The headline is bs, the article talks about how the PC version would be better since it will take advantage of gaming rigs or play on average computers. Pc wins

^yeah thats what i also think,i wonder why they said that it is a bit better on 360

god not that old story again........

is this game a direct sequel...? i never played the first one

I can assure you it doesn't matter.

this always happens with multiplatform, but seriously whats with the developers and the ps3. my guess is the insuficient bandwith in the gaphics card and it cost too much money to yank more bandwith out of the cell.

I wonder what sort of gaming PC specs you will need to run this game?

BTW: We are all not fortunate to live in the USA where computers are really cheap. Sucks to live in PAL region where prices are inflated for everything. Australia, NZ, Europe, expensive prices because we do not complain unlike the Americans and our markets are a lot smaller than the USA with a population of 300 million people.

PC FTW!!!

u want to tell me that 360 beat the PC in farcry 2 ??? meh .. what a fan talk.