true UE works better with the 360 and well done to microsoft for creating a console that is easy to develop for,

i think people should stop complaining about the ps3 because it is sonys fault for making it so dam complicated, however the developers really should create engines that take advantage of the hardware given instead of trying to treat the ps3 like a pc.

BS! Gamespot and Eurogamer give it to 360 too.

PC version is 8 too
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=87909&page=2

You mean UT3 PS3 > UT3 PC ?
You Fail!

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=89782&page=2
"The score, then. Jim went for eight on PC. I'm going for nine on PS3. I could fob you off and claim this is because the context is different. In fact, I probably ought to, because it's true: Team Fortress 2 isn't as effective in the PS3's slightly disappointing Orange Box release, although it's still a better multiplayer game outside of the platform question, and the alternatives (Resistance, most notably) don't do as much as well as this does. This feels like the PS3's new online FPS benchmark. But I've digressed - the other part of it is that I guess I like UT3 more than Jim, and he loved it."

 because it was a cheap port, not a worked on update like bethedsa did with oblivion

game certainly does run flawlessly, and has tons and tons of mods for the game including 2d deathmatches. 360 version cant do any of these so ut3 ps3 > 360

epic made a better game on ps3 with ut3 than 360 ut3.

most gave it to ps3, its already been covered on vgchartz, the ps3 install really does help cut those texture loads and pop ins compared to 360 version, although both are same and deserve same score.

The graphics for the 360 version of Oblivion were improved for the 360, but Bethesda and other avenues still claimed that the PS3 version still looked better.

MrMarc with all due respect, it's hard to take your personal assessments as fact when you subjectively claim that "Real 'hardcore' gamers play Nintendo."

One of the very few posts that sees that these things are not as black and white as most here sees because the biasness in most of these posts really shows.  The topic here in regards to the UE, not a 360 vs. PS3 debate which paints the fanboys who they are.  Both consoles have had their of multi-platform games released simutaneously with the 360 having the better version some of the times while the PS3 have had the better version some of the times as well.  Also, both consoles have had a later release of multi-platform games in which the later version is the better version, again for both consoles.  And the word "optimization" keeps getting thrown around.  I hope you all know that optimization is all relative while not taking into account the evolution of specific engines.  Both consoles are still relatively young, and the approach to developing software on both consoles is apparently different.  Get over yourselves.

I for one have seen that the PS3 version of Oblivion looks and run better than the 360.  It IMPLIES that the PS3 is more powerful than the 360, but it only proves that Bethesda can make a better looking version of the game.  More powerful or not is never the issue with me.  The end results is what's important.  Also, are you expecting the PS3 version of Bioshock to look worse than the 360 version?  Who know what will happen.  If Epic can spend the extra time to make the 360 version of UTIII look better (assumingly) than the PS3 version, why can't the same be said for Bioshock PS3?  And so what if Bioshock PS3 isn't as quite as nice looking than the 360 version?  To say that from now on all multi-platform games will look and run better on the 360 is highly improbably.  I'm not saying you're saying this.  What I am saying is that as long as both consoles have their share of better looking games (they have and it's safe to say that they will), you guys are just going to keep arguing in circles.