By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Sega: I think we did new things a bit too early

Inside the fun factory of Sega’s Tokyo HQ

Our correspondent reports back from the gaming world’s answer to Willy Wonka’s tasting lab

When you arrive at the Japanese headquarters of one of the world’s leading games companies, you half-expect to be assaulted by employees wearing primary colours and bouncing off the ceiling. The first sight of Sega’s Tokyo HQ is encouraging: in the lobby there’s a statue of Sonic the Hedgehog, the company’s emblem since 1991, when he first appeared as the “cool” rival to Nintendo’s lovable Mario.

When I first came here, in 1992, Sonic was at the peak of his popularity. The first game had sold 4 million copies worldwide, and the sequel would go on to sell 6 million. I remember meeting the people who were then designing the games I would play a year later with something approaching awe. They mirrored this with embarrassment. Their office was just an office, they explained to me, no different from the one I worked in. The workers came in, did their job and went home. It was like banking.

These days, there’s more of a sense of a mission around the building. The interior decor is still a functional beige, but the basement now features a relaxation room, alongside a smoking area set beside an inclined Japanese garden. The intervening years have not been kind to Sega. In the 1990s it sought to capitalise on the booming home games market by releasing a slew of new machines without decent games to support them. In 2001, it withdrew from the console market, leaving the field to Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony. These days, Sega makes games for all three of its once-deadly rivals.

“I think the entrance of Sony and Microsoft changed everything,” says Masanao Maeda, Sega’s corporate director. “But in a good way. We were the first company to offer a portable colour video console, the first to bring 16-bit graphics, the first to offer internet play on a console, but I think we did new things a bit too early. We now have an advantage in software in that we develop all over the world for the international market.”

The big game under hush-hush development today is Sonic Unleashed, which will be released on high-definition consoles later this year. In these drab offices, the walls piled high with computer equipment, a small team led by a remarkably cheerful Yoshihisa Hashimoto has been reimagining Sega’s blue mascot in 3D in adventures that will take him across the world. The pressure must be on? “Well, I was really happy to get the chance to reimagine the game in the way I want,” he says, “but as the news comes out that you’re in charge, the pressure mounts as you realise how many people are hoping you do a good job.”

As the deadline approaches, work on a game can involve days or even weeks of sleeping in the office (there are bunks for the purpose), followed by several months off as a reward. “I work so hard at this because it’s also my hobby,” Hashimoto says with a smile. I do hope he’s still smiling in four months.

http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/gadgets_and_gaming/article4254651.ece



Vaio - "Bury me at Milanello"      R.I.P AC Milan

In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird.
Now the world is weird  and people take Prozac  to make it normal.

If laughing is the best medicine and marijuana makes you laugh

Is marijuana the best medicine?

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."

“If any creator has not played Mario, then they’re probably not a good creator. That’s something I can say with 100 percent confidence. Mario is, for game creators, the development bible.

Around the Network

Yea, let's go with that. Or maybe it's because after genesis you released shitty add-on after shitty add-on, mixed with a couple shitty consoles, and lost all respect by the time you smartened up.



Aj_habfan said:
Yea, let's go with that. Or maybe it's because after genesis you released shitty add-on after shitty add-on, mixed with a couple shitty consoles, and lost all respect by the time you smartened up.

 

What are you talking about? Saturn was a decent console with decent games (too few of them though), Dreamcast was a great console with great games (quite a lot of them actually). Had Sega had more money, they would still be making hardware.

What essentially put them out of business was Sony's (money-driven) competition. It kind of satisfies me therefore that Sony now gets to feel what it's like to have a competitor that simply does not have to care about money.



You could say that they were too early, or (worse yet) that they pushed forward technology that gamers before gamers were interested in it (often) at the expense of features that gamers were interested in.



Golvellius said:
Aj_habfan said:
Yea, let's go with that. Or maybe it's because after genesis you released shitty add-on after shitty add-on, mixed with a couple shitty consoles, and lost all respect by the time you smartened up.

 

What are you talking about? Saturn was a decent console with decent games (too few of them though), Dreamcast was a great console with great games (quite a lot of them actually). Had Sega had more money, they would still be making hardware.

What essentially put them out of business was Sony's (money-driven) competition. It kind of satisfies me therefore that Sony now gets to feel what it's like to have a competitor that simply does not have to care about money.

It doesn't matter how good they were. After Genesis, there was 32X, Sega CD which were expensive, shitty, and had support pulled quickly. That already is enough to hurt a companies reputation. Not to mention the Nomad.

Sega Saturn did good in Japan, but shit everywhere else. So bad, Sega was already talking about it's replacement 2 years after it's release.

Dreamcast was solid, but by this point Playstation had established itself as the dominant brand and Sega's reputation was in the hole. Sega screwed over their customers time and time again, and I'm glad they payed the price.

 



Around the Network
Aj_habfan said:
Golvellius said:
Aj_habfan said:
Yea, let's go with that. Or maybe it's because after genesis you released shitty add-on after shitty add-on, mixed with a couple shitty consoles, and lost all respect by the time you smartened up.

 

What are you talking about? Saturn was a decent console with decent games (too few of them though), Dreamcast was a great console with great games (quite a lot of them actually). Had Sega had more money, they would still be making hardware.

What essentially put them out of business was Sony's (money-driven) competition. It kind of satisfies me therefore that Sony now gets to feel what it's like to have a competitor that simply does not have to care about money.

It doesn't matter how good they were. After Genesis, there was 32X, Sega CD which were expensive, shitty, and had support pulled quickly. That already is enough to hurt a companies reputation. Not to mention the Nomad.

Sega Saturn did good in Japan, but shit everywhere else. So bad, Sega was already talking about it's replacement 2 years after it's release.

Dreamcast was solid, but by this point Playstation had established itself as the dominant brand and Sega's reputation was in the hole. Sega screwed over their customers time and time again, and I'm glad they payed the price.

 

 

I cannot see where they "screwed over their customers". The only unnecessary thing was the 32X, but anyone with some common sense could easily figure out that this wouldn't get a lot of software support, given the imminent Saturn release.

You actually agree that Saturn and DC were good products - how is it Sega's fault if they underperform saleswise despite the availability of good games?

"When DC was released, Sega's reputation was in the hole" - correct, but solely because of Sony's dominance who had way more (3rd party) blockbuster games on their platform, that's why it underperformed even though it had fantastic games. So one could say that it was Sony's fault that the DC didn't receive the acceptance it deserved.