Aj_habfan said:
It doesn't matter how good they were. After Genesis, there was 32X, Sega CD which were expensive, shitty, and had support pulled quickly. That already is enough to hurt a companies reputation. Not to mention the Nomad. Sega Saturn did good in Japan, but shit everywhere else. So bad, Sega was already talking about it's replacement 2 years after it's release. Dreamcast was solid, but by this point Playstation had established itself as the dominant brand and Sega's reputation was in the hole. Sega screwed over their customers time and time again, and I'm glad they payed the price.
|
I cannot see where they "screwed over their customers". The only unnecessary thing was the 32X, but anyone with some common sense could easily figure out that this wouldn't get a lot of software support, given the imminent Saturn release.
You actually agree that Saturn and DC were good products - how is it Sega's fault if they underperform saleswise despite the availability of good games?
"When DC was released, Sega's reputation was in the hole" - correct, but solely because of Sony's dominance who had way more (3rd party) blockbuster games on their platform, that's why it underperformed even though it had fantastic games. So one could say that it was Sony's fault that the DC didn't receive the acceptance it deserved.







